Robin,

nice review. but the lack of quantitative evaluation of the limitation of the images at low light, relative to the Panasonic leaves us in the position of having to take your word for it (since, as you note, I cannot tell the difference between the screen grabs). I assume that by "cleaner" image you mean less noise. You might try taking a frame grab of each and blowing up a section and posting that blown up section with a look at the noise. not that I don't believe you.... ;-).

Also, I am skeptical of your claim that the PDX10 is better at 15 lux than the GL2. So would be all the wedding photographers that I know who have used both in dim lighting in churches.

Again....we are relegated to taking your word for it which, in this case, I would offer is highly suspect.

Maybe you can design a method of demonstrating a quantitative method of providing data we can assess in light of your comments. Sort of like a real experiment.

Thanks.

__________________
Sony DCR-TRV950 [Mini-DV Vid](2003)
Canon ES-970 [8mm Video] (1998)
Canon Z135 [35mm] (1995)
Yashica Mat-124G [2/14x2/14] (1994)
Canon Elan [35mm (1994)]
Canon AE-1 [35mm] (1981)