Go Back   Camcorderinfo.com Message Board > Main Buying & General Board
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 12 votes, 4.92 average. Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-29-2005, 11:00 PM
Dennis Vogel Dennis Vogel is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 9,422
Shedding Some Light On "Low Light"

At this time of year lots of people are considering the purchase of a new camcorder. High on many people's list of features is the ability to shoot video indoors or outdoors at night in what is commonly referred to as "low light" conditions. The first thing you should know is that "low light" is a very subjective term. What one person means by low light is often different from what someone else means. I'll try to clear up that problem and address some other things to consider as you try to decide if a certain camcorder meets your needs or you compare different camcorders.

Consumer Camcorders Don't Record Well In Low Light

You're going to find that most consumer-grade camcorders under $1000 don't work too well in low light. This is because of several factors. Because of the desire to make camcorders smaller and smaller and to include a still photo feature, camcorders manufacturers put very small CCDs with a large number of pixels on them in their consumer camcorders. Small CCDs mean only a small amount of light will register on them and the large number of pixels means each pixel will only get a small amount of that light. As a result, it takes a large amount of light to get a good, sharp image on tape. As you might expect, a camcorder with larger CCDs and fewer pixels will usually work better in low light conditions.

Of course, as in much of life, there are tradeoffs to be considered. Fewer pixels usually means less sharpness in the video, all other things being equal. And all other things aren't usually equal so simply going by pixel count won't always tell you which camcorder is better. The only real way to tell is to shoot some video and see how well the cam performs. Not always practical but that's the way it is.

Camcorders Don't Work In No Light

Every so often someone will be looking for a camcorder that works in complete dark. When you think about this for a second you realize there is no such thing. Camcorders (and all cameras, digital or film-based for that matter) work by recording reflected light. If there is no light to reflect off things there obviously can't be anything to record.

Some cams say they work with no light, so what gives? These usually accomplish this by using an on-cam infrared light source and CCDs that are sensitive to infrared light. So there really is a light, it's just not one you can see. These cams usually take those greenish, night vision images you've seen in TV news or war movies. That's not the kind of thing most folks want for their video but for certain surveillance-type applications it might be adequate.

The Mysterious Lux Rating

The measure of light you'll see associated with camcorders is the lux. Virtually all camcorder specs include a lux rating. Many cams offer relatively low lux ratings, usually in single digits or low double digits. But be sure to check the specs for how they achieve this. These cams sometimes work by using some kind of "night mode". Night mode often uses a slow shutter speed or increased gain as a way to increase the amount of light that gets recorded. One thing usually not mentioned in the specs is what the video looks like with these low light modes. In other words, they claim the cam will record images in extreme low light but they don't say whether you'll be able to tell what you recorded. Slow shutter speeds will produce blurry video if there is even the slightest movement by your subjects or the cam. Increased gain will produce graininess due to increased video noise in your images. Color rendition will often degrade in night mode, too, and auto focusing often doesn't work as well as in better lighting.

Something else to consider; although a standard is in place in the United States to specify minimum quality standards for light levels, adherence to this standard is not mandatory. Since manufacturers know that consumers want cameras that shoot under low light levels, they are reluctant to use that standard and look inferior to a competitor who is not adhering to the standard. So beware of the claims manufacturers make for low light capabilities.

So How Much Light Do I Need?

You can measure the amount of light when you are shooting by using a light meter. Some are calibrated in lux and one of these meters would give you a good reading on what you are dealing with. But, most of us don't want to spend the money on a light meter nor do we need such precision in determining how much light there is in a scene. So, as a guide to light levels in typical conditions you will encounter, here are some light examples from "Digital Video Pocket Guide" by Derrick Story from O'Reilly.


100,000 lux.....directly lit by bright sunlight
10,000 lux......full daylight
1,000 lux.......bright overcast day
500-1,000 lux...open shade on lightly cloudy day
500 lux.........brightly lit natural light interior; multiple windows with no added artificial light)
150 lux.........commercial artificial lighting indoors (typical shopping mall with no added daylight)
100 lux.........dark overcast day (high quality threshold for most camcorders in daylight mode)
100 lux.........typical restaurant or coffee shop artificial lighting (bright enough to easily read menu)
50 lux..........room lit by single ceiling light bulb (lightly painted walls, 100 watt bulb)
10 lux..........early twilight
10 lux..........light from 60 watt bulb from 10 feet away
1 lux...........late twilight
0.1 lux.........full moon


This list is a pretty good guide to how much light you'll need (or how low a lux rating your camcorder will need) to record video in different conditions. But note that as I mentioned above, this doesn't necessarily mean you'll get good video. But at least you'll know that most consumer camcorders won't do a good job of recording your newborn asleep lit only by a night light.

To underscore the need for at least 100 lux to get decent video, one magazine, Camcorder and Computer Video, in its camcorder reviews always lists the manufacturers lux rating with the following caveat: "However, for good video, C&CV recommends illumination of 100 lux or more.)"

So, armed with some knowledge you should now be a better shopper as you go about the sometimes daunting task of trying to figure out which camcorder meets your needs but won't break your budget. You may not find exactly what you need in your price range but at least you won't be unhappily surprised on Christmas, Chanukah, Kwanzaa or whatever holiday you celebrate as you try out that new camcorder in the light conditions you will encounter.

Happy shooting.

Good luck.

Dennis
Reply With Quote



  #2  
Old 11-30-2005, 12:31 AM
sektionschef's Avatar
sektionschef sektionschef is offline
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 1,406
Excellent!!!
Reply With Quote



  #3  
Old 11-30-2005, 01:34 PM
bizar bizar is offline
Active Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 207
You maybe should make this one sticky for the december season.
Reply With Quote



  #4  
Old 11-30-2005, 10:04 PM
Dennis Vogel Dennis Vogel is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 9,422
Yeah, I thought of stickying it but there's so many that the stickys start to get in the way. Maybe for the holiday season is a good idea.

Good luck.

Dennis
Reply With Quote



  #5  
Old 12-01-2005, 04:26 AM
w7ox's Avatar
w7ox w7ox is offline
Active Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis Vogel
Camcorders (and all cameras, digital or film-based for that matter) work by recording reflected light.

Excellent exposition, Dennis; glad you made this important note a sticky. But the astronomer in me makes me happy the above is not quite correct .. at least for solar and stellar imaging

Phil
Reply With Quote



  #6  
Old 12-01-2005, 10:25 PM
Dennis Vogel Dennis Vogel is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 9,422
Uh, yes, you are correct. Maybe Mr. Smarty Pants Astronomer would like to suggest something better.

Good luck.

Dennis
Reply With Quote



  #7  
Old 12-02-2005, 09:52 AM
w7ox's Avatar
w7ox w7ox is offline
Active Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis Vogel
Maybe Mr. Smarty Pants Astronomer would like to suggest something better.

Not really: It's an excellent piece; I read it carefully and learned a lot. The table of lux equivalents is really useful .. which is why I think this should be a permanent sticky (data too useful to get lost, since it puts the claimed lux specs of the mfr in a real-world perspective for buyers).

In any case. I don't expect to be doing astronomy with my camcorder, so in this context my comment is a true nit

Phil
Reply With Quote



  #8  
Old 12-02-2005, 01:54 PM
Dennis Vogel Dennis Vogel is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 9,422
Thanks for you compliment. I, too, like the table of lux values. I've posted it here before but it's buried in old posts by now.

As far as the reflected light point, if you think of anything, let me know. I'll try to think of something, as well.

Good luck.

Dennis
Reply With Quote



  #9  
Old 12-05-2005, 02:18 PM
bizar bizar is offline
Active Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 207
easy

Camcorders (and all cameras, digital or film-based for that matter) work by recording reflected light

could be better:

camcorders (and all cameras, digital of film-based for that matter) work by recording INCOMMING light.

Just like your eye. So it can be reflected light, but also a light source. But there have to be some kind of light rays into the lens of the camcorder onto the ccd. Maybe you should add that alle mainstream sensors (ccd, cmos, etc) are less sensitive then human eye. So an ok level of lighting for an eye is mostly not enough for a digital device. Ways to enhance this is amplifying the information (gain) or having the sensor exposed longer to the incomming light (long shutter times). The gain can result in noise and the long shutter times in blurry video of moving objects. Noise from gain can be surpressed by noise reductions but that can result in smoothing out the picture.

Low lux ratings of camcorders are not standardised and in 99,9% of the time a lux rating is just marketing talk and based on nothing a consumer expects. 0 lux rating is used in the cases where the camcorder has its own video light to put a light on an object not too far from the camcorder and then recording the reflected light from that subject. The situation without the video light is 0 lux, but the video light makes it more than 0 lux.
Reply With Quote



  #10  
Old 12-05-2005, 04:11 PM
poncho's Avatar
poncho poncho is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Mexico, USA!
Posts: 10,350
Thermal imaging technology....



Rich
__________________
FireWire Survey
Reply With Quote



  #11  
Old 12-05-2005, 04:18 PM
Guy Bruner Guy Bruner is offline
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ashford, AL
Posts: 4,921
Good job, Dennis!
__________________
Guy

Camcorder User Network
Reply With Quote



  #12  
Old 12-05-2005, 10:25 PM
Dennis Vogel Dennis Vogel is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 9,422
Hey, bizar, thanks for the suggestions. I'll try to work some of them in when I get some free time.

Good luck.

Dennis
Reply With Quote



  #13  
Old 12-07-2005, 08:09 AM
Jj4 Jj4 is offline
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 994
I too have recently become exposed to the world of astronomy. It was just after my wife got the credit card bill for the Canopus converter. Talk about seeing stars! Great post Dennis!

joe
__________________
So much information... the more I learn, the more questions develop. If I keep learning at this pace, soon I'll be too dumb to continue!
Reply With Quote



  #14  
Old 12-08-2005, 04:39 AM
bizar bizar is offline
Active Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 207
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jj4
I too have recently become exposed to the world of astronomy. It was just after my wife got the credit card bill for the Canopus converter. Talk about seeing stars!

Still better then your wife having the credit card and you getting the bills. That would KNOCK ya out and you wouldn't even be able to see the first star before you go down, that fast.. (at least with my wife)
Reply With Quote



  #15  
Old 12-15-2005, 11:17 AM
poncho's Avatar
poncho poncho is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Mexico, USA!
Posts: 10,350

Last edited by poncho : 12-15-2005 at 01:00 PM.
Reply With Quote



Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:52 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.