Go Back   Camcorderinfo.com Message Board > Sony HighDefinition camcorders > Sony AVCHD HDR-TG1, HDR-SR1/510, HDR-UX1
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-26-2007, 05:55 PM
jbirdfl jbirdfl is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 19
AVCHD editing (Pinnacle studio 11 ultimate)

This seems to cost about the same as the Ulead program. Does anyone have experience with this, or better yet, with both? Weeding through reviews and features on the internet I'm finding it hard to figure out which is easier to use or has the greatest flexibility as far as useful features. I mainly try to do documentary style films (not home movies of my children growing up, etc.), so would like as many semi-pro features as I can get. I have an earlier version of Pinnacle which has crashed (after several hours of editing, so you can imagine the expletives coming from the editing room at that point!) more than once, not to mention features such as color balancing, sharpness, better sound, etc. requiring that I purchase additional "keys" from Pinnacle (which in my opinion should come with an editing program at the initial price in the first place). Obviously I need it to edit AVCHD as easily and quickly as possible (no conversion requirements and such).
Reply With Quote



  #2  
Old 08-26-2007, 07:27 PM
wulfraed wulfraed is offline
Elite Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 1,612
I don't believe /any/ of the consumer editors can natively render back to AVCHD (which isn't, it would appear, a standard, unlike HDV... Sony and Panasonic came up with the format, and then diverged in implementation, and who knows what Canon's version is like -- which is why the Sony Vegas family can only process Sony's AVCHD as input).

So... Even if you can maneuver a timeline reasonably well (and that is more a capability of the CPU), the edited output /will/, in all likelihood, have to be converted to some other format.

Nero7 apparently can output AVCHD and BluRay authoring, but I've never heard it suggested as a serious NLE.
Reply With Quote



  #3  
Old 08-27-2007, 01:56 PM
inaz4sun's Avatar
inaz4sun inaz4sun is offline
Active Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 109
Quote:
Originally Posted by wulfraed
I don't believe /any/ of the consumer editors can natively render back to AVCHD (which isn't, it would appear, a standard, unlike HDV... Sony and Panasonic came up with the format, and then diverged in implementation, and who knows what Canon's version is like -- which is why the Sony Vegas family can only process Sony's AVCHD as input).

So... Even if you can maneuver a timeline reasonably well (and that is more a capability of the CPU), the edited output /will/, in all likelihood, have to be converted to some other format.

Nero7 apparently can output AVCHD and BluRay authoring, but I've never heard it suggested as a serious NLE.

It can output AVCHD, however when I attempted to take a disc, it said the estimate time to process was 3 days. Now maybe that is a product of my computer only being a P4 2.66 but still, ouch, that is basically useless. But I'll try it again when I get my new quad core system.
__________________
Sony UX1 HD camcorder owner.
Reply With Quote



  #4  
Old 08-27-2007, 03:41 PM
wulfraed wulfraed is offline
Elite Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 1,612
Quote:
Originally Posted by inaz4sun
It can output AVCHD, however when I attempted to take a disc, it said the estimate time to process was 3 days. Now maybe that is a product of my computer only being a P4 2.66 but still, ouch, that is basically useless. But I'll try it again when I get my new quad core system.

What type of effects/filters had you applied...

My routine estimate is that, as HDV (I'm sorry, but I would prefer to never touch an AVCHD camera) is 4.5 times standard definition DV, any rendering will take about 4.5 times the equivalent length DV (and maybe more if the source file is in a compressed format, since it is now doing decompress:apply effects:compress.

I've also had SD DV renders take 12 hours for a 1 hour source (unsharp masking is a CPU hog). If that had been HDV, I'd be looking at 2 to 3 days. This, on a 3.4GHz P4HT!

Final rendering is never fast -- except in those few cases where the NLE can perform "smart rendering"... Most support that for simple DV as each frame is independent, so they just copy unmodified frames as is. Few do it for MPEG formats -- especially if the format standard specifies a particular GoP size... Deleting one frame means all subsequent frames must be decoded, "shifted left" by one frame position, and reencoded. Smart rendering could be done if the the encoder is smart enough to render a short GoP packet, leaving the rest unchanged.

I don't worry about "smart rendering" as even something as minor sounding as a brightness/contrast adjustment requires modifying each frame.
Reply With Quote



  #5  
Old 08-31-2007, 10:25 AM
c0ugar69 c0ugar69 is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: fresno, california
Posts: 3
pinnacle

I have had sucess with avchd movies, i have made about 3 movies 30-40 minutes in length. the time to render has been 3-4 hours. this is on a quadcore 2.4ghz with 3 gig of ram. even sd movies take a while. Them movies come out good, I am still learning how to add in transitions and efeects. lots of fun.
Reply With Quote



  #6  
Old 09-13-2007, 05:19 PM
Zyphrax Zyphrax is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 20
I'm in need of a new PC as well. I can barely play the AVCHD movies on my P4 2.8Ghz, but for editting it's too slow. Might buy a Quadcore around Christmass.

I've also tried the newest Ulead VideoStudio, because it contains a "smart proxy" system, which sounds a whole lot better than it actually is. It makes a MPEG2 copy of your AVCHD files for editting and uses the orginal AVCHD files in the rendering process. It makes editting a bit more possible, but it's not that user friendly and rendering still takes ages.
Reply With Quote



  #7  
Old 09-29-2007, 07:59 AM
SONYCAMMAN SONYCAMMAN is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 97
Unhappy Help !!

Can someone help me? I've downloaded a 30 day free trial of Ulead Video Studio 11 Plus, which has support AVCHD editing, but I'm at a loss as to how to import a file into the timeline or program at all! It just won't recognize .m2ts files! Any suggestions?
Reply With Quote



  #8  
Old 09-30-2007, 03:44 PM
Zyphrax Zyphrax is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 20
From the Ulead FAQ:

Q: When I import video from an AVCHD camcorder, is there anything I need to watch out for?

A: If you wish to capture the video from your camcorder (Hard-dsc or DVD) you should start VideoStudio first, then connect your device. In the capture step, select “Import from DVD/DVD-VR” and select your device – it will usually show up with a drive letter like a hard drive. Then click import, and it will offer you the choice to select the clips that you want to import and edit.
Reply With Quote



  #9  
Old 10-01-2007, 03:59 AM
SONYCAMMAN SONYCAMMAN is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 97
Red face

Zyphrax,

Thanks for this information, but I guess I did'nt make myself clear. My fault.The files I'm trying to get into the program are already on my pc and not on the camera anymore!
Reply With Quote



  #10  
Old 10-01-2007, 05:01 AM
Zyphrax Zyphrax is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 20
Ah, I see. The Sony software copies the videos to your computer under differrent filenames, however the files are not transcoded and are exactly the same as on your camera.

Maybe two solutions:
1. Copy the .m2ts files back to your camera, I believe they should have the .m2t extension on your camera.

or

2. Rename the files on your harddisk to .m2t, and follow the steps from the FAQ. And browse to C:\..... (the folder where you keep your local copies).

It isn't that userfriendly, but it might work. I'm not sure that ".m2t" is the right extension. But you can easily check that by browsing your camera's storage, and having a look at the filenames.

Good luck.
Reply With Quote



  #11  
Old 10-01-2007, 06:10 AM
SONYCAMMAN SONYCAMMAN is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 97
Lightbulb

Zyphrax,

I've tried renaming the file extensions .avi, .mov .mpg4 and several other things: Yeah !! You guessed ! In real frustration ! I gotta laugh myself ! This includes .mts, but not .m2t as you suggest!
I'll try it and see what happens !
But what a great idea! Putting the files back onto the camera. Now why on earth did'nt I think of that??
But surely there has got to be a way of getting these files into the software from the pc itself. This software is supposed to edit AVCHD afterall.
Hmmm !

Cheers
Reply With Quote



  #12  
Old 04-08-2008, 08:03 AM
Jetexas Jetexas is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 18
I had the same problem with Ulead

I never could get Ulead to recognize files already on my computer either. No amount of playing with extensions made it work. On their help site, it only gives the process for capturing from camera or from a DVD created by a camcorder that records directly to DVD. I gave up on it and went to Pinnacle.
Reply With Quote



  #13  
Old 04-08-2008, 08:10 AM
Ken7 Ken7 is offline
Active Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 101
Does anyone have problems getting the thumbnails to display properly in the PMB software after capture from an SR12? I find I can't even play it through the PMB after capture to my hard drive.

I can access those files and play it fine in WMP, but not PMB. My friend has exactly the same issues with his PMB. Actually the only way I can get it to play after capture is to right click on a thumbnail and say 'trim'. That opens a smaller window and the video does play. Very weird.
Reply With Quote



  #14  
Old 04-09-2008, 02:41 PM
jaymode jaymode is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: US
Posts: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken7
Does anyone have problems getting the thumbnails to display properly in the PMB software after capture from an SR12? I find I can't even play it through the PMB after capture to my hard drive.

I can access those files and play it fine in WMP, but not PMB. My friend has exactly the same issues with his PMB. Actually the only way I can get it to play after capture is to right click on a thumbnail and say 'trim'. That opens a smaller window and the video does play. Very weird.

I had the same issue and the solution I found was to uninstall all other codec packs and any codec for AVCHD. Then rerun the updater that generates the thumbnails.
Reply With Quote



  #15  
Old 04-29-2008, 01:57 PM
Timosha Timosha is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Luxembourg
Posts: 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken7
Does anyone have problems getting the thumbnails to display properly in the PMB software after capture from an SR12? I find I can't even play it through the PMB after capture to my hard drive.

I can access those files and play it fine in WMP, but not PMB. My friend has exactly the same issues with his PMB. Actually the only way I can get it to play after capture is to right click on a thumbnail and say 'trim'. That opens a smaller window and the video does play. Very weird.

I d have these problems in Windows Vista Ultimate x64, but not on laptops wit Vista Business x86 and Windows XP Professional SP3.
Reply With Quote



Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:22 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.