Go Back   Camcorderinfo.com Message Board > Reader Comments
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-23-2001, 12:00 AM
Cubbage Brown
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
VX2000

<!-- Rating:</B> 5<img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><BR> --><BR>I have owned several camcorders over the last 20 years and the VX2000 is the first DV. All that it does far exceeds anything that I have seen in the other camcorders!!
Reply With Quote



  #2  
Old 01-23-2002, 12:00 AM
Justin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Great Camera!

<!-- Rating:</B> 4.5<img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/half_star.gif" width=12 height=18><BR> --><BR>For the money you will not find a better camera. The only thing to make it better would have been pro audio inputs and a better zoom. Top notch camera though!
Reply With Quote



  #3  
Old 02-14-2002, 12:00 AM
Niko
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
VX-2000

<!-- Rating:</B> 5<img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><BR> --><BR>The sharpest and most color accurate pro-sumer mini-DV camera out there. I\'m a pro photographer (film), and I know sharpness and color accuracy when I see it. The Canon XL-1 didn\'t even come close. The whole Canon lens thing is so overrated anyway, it\'s impossible for video to show the true sharpness of a top notch lens anyway. No, I\'m not a Sony rep, I just wanted to pass the word along that the VX2000 is a fantastic camera. I actually think it\'s underpriced. I also love the stupid memory stick thingy, I made fun of it at first but I actually use it!
Reply With Quote



  #4  
Old 02-14-2002, 12:00 AM
Niko
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
VX2000 again

<!-- Rating:</B> 5<img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><BR> --><BR>Here\'s another 5 stars to make it ten!
Reply With Quote



  #5  
Old 02-22-2002, 12:00 AM
Daniel L.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The best one

<!-- Rating:</B> 1<img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><BR> --><BR>best camcorder in the world. we are a production company and we use it every day! Better than Canon XL 1 s because of the screen and size!
Reply With Quote



  #6  
Old 02-22-2002, 12:00 AM
Daniel L.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The best one

<!-- Rating:</B> 5<img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><BR> --><BR>best camcorder in the world. we are a production company and we use it every day! Better than Canon XL 1 s because of the screen and size!
Reply With Quote



  #7  
Old 02-26-2002, 12:00 AM
greg wisniewski
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
<!-- Rating:</B> 5<img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><BR> --><BR>It stands up in performance to our large $6000.00 cameras. Correction.. It beats the pants off our more expensive cameras. Technology marches on & to date this may be the best camera I ever bought.
Reply With Quote



  #8  
Old 03-10-2002, 12:00 AM
Tom Schuessler
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
very tough camera

<!-- Rating:</B> 5<img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><BR> --><BR>I have had my VX for over a year now and just returned from two months in Africa including several days in the Serengeti taping everything I could see. Never forget to bring a cleaning cassette especially if you have some hours of use on it and/or you are in a dirty environment. I have run into Sony tapes that drop out video and sometimes sound in the last five minutes of tape. Upon examination of the tape there have been creases in the tape but most tapes have been ok. The size of the camera and the quality of the video are great... everyone that sees the results are impressed. Now wouldn\'t it be great to have a $2500 high definition camcorder that same size. Also get a wide angle lens for the VX. It enables steadier appearing shots when hand holding the camera.
Reply With Quote



  #9  
Old 04-02-2002, 12:00 AM
CINDY JONES
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
THE STUFF THAT DREAMS ARE MADE OF!!!!!!!!!!!

<!-- Rating:</B> 5<img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><BR> --><BR>The VX2000 is OUTSTANDING. Rugged, reliable, simple and sound. I couldn\'t be more impressed. I only wish I had a half dozen of them.

It is absolutely my favorite possession. It is ASTOUNDING the sort of quality you get with the VX2000. I am using it over the summer to produce a number of short films. It has everything I need and options for anything I might want down the road. Paired with my sony vaio and editing setup I feel like I can take on the world! Step back and watch me FLY THIS PLANE. With THIS I am a FORCE to be reckoned with. There should be more stars.. it should be a TEN at least.
Reply With Quote



  #10  
Old 07-02-2002, 12:00 AM
ian.thomas
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
vx 2000

<!-- Rating:</B> 5<img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><BR> --><BR>THIS CAMERA BEATS THE PANTS OFF THE TRV 900
I DO WILDLIFE FILMS AND THE COLOURS ARE FANTASTIC
THE ONLY THING I WOULD LOVE IS A LARGER OPTICAL
ZOOM OTHERWISE IT IS FANTASTIC
Reply With Quote



  #11  
Old 07-14-2002, 12:00 AM
ccbatson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
term limit is up

<!-- Rating:</B> 1<img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><BR> --><BR>I agree that the vx2000 was the king of the hill in its\' time, but that time is now up. The next generation is here, and vx2000\'s little sibling the trv950 is heir to the crown (until the next gen vx2000 (vx3000??) comes to reclaim the throne.
Reply With Quote



  #12  
Old 07-19-2002, 12:00 AM
AaronPadilla
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
VX2000 SOLID

<!-- Rating:</B> 4.5<img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/half_star.gif" width=12 height=18><BR> --><BR>The VX 2000 is a camera for those who enjoy experimenting. I have read many articles that downplay the progressive scan functionality. My own adjustments of the shutter speed, white balance, and the exposure dial on the side of the camera have allowed me to record some great video in both normal and progressive scan modes. Adjusting these settings one can achieve a wide range of results, but like any camera with so many custamizable settings it requires much trial and error.
Reply With Quote



  #13  
Old 08-25-2002, 12:00 AM
ian thomas
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
vx 2000

<!-- Rating:</B> 5<img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><BR> --><BR>its still takeing on all newcomers and beating
them its picture quality is out of this world it
is a fantastic tool
Reply With Quote



  #14  
Old 08-27-2002, 12:00 AM
Vista Productions
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
VX 2000

<!-- Rating:</B> 4.5<img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/half_star.gif" width=12 height=18><BR> --><BR>A great camera, specially when you are a lot on the move.
Reply With Quote



  #15  
Old 10-10-2002, 12:00 AM
LEO MED
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The best picture ever on my TV!

<!-- Rating:</B> 5<img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><img src="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/icons/star.gif" width=22 height=18><BR> --><BR>The moment i saw the pictures in my tv, I just couldnībelieve it, it looks like a real movie.
Reply With Quote



Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:05 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.