or Browse:
Type
Brand
Price
Need

Apple iPhone 3G S

Camcorder Review

Previous: Page 4

Color Performance
Page 5

Low Light Performance

A solid performance in low light. No shutter speed control means motion can look choppy in low light.

We often see good low light sensitivity scores on ultra-compact budget models because the camcorders automatically employ slow shutter speeds in dim light. The iPhone 3G S appears to be no different. The phone needed only 8 lux of light to reach 50 IRE on our waveform monitor, but it did so by using a slow shutter speed of roughly 1/30 of a second. Slow shutters will produce choppy, blurred motion, so we always turn them off for our low light testing when possible. With the iPhone, along with most budget-cams, these slow shutters cannot be disengaged. More on how we test low light sensitivity.

The Samsung Omnia and Flip UltraHD needed approximately the same amount of light as the iPhone to hit 50 IRE on our waveform monitor. They too made use of slow shutter speeds in low light, however. The Sony MHS-PM1 did horribly in this test and didn’t show much improvement when we engaged its slow shutter, low light scene mode.

Low Light Sensitivity Comparison
0
2
4
6
8
10
Low Light Sensitivity Score

In our low light testing the noise levels were low on the iPhone 3G S, but they weren’t any better than the Flip UltraHD or Samsung Omnia. The Omnia actually scored the best in this test, while the Sony MHS-PM1 was the worst. None of these camcorders or devices had a major problem with noise, however, which is somewhat surprising. More on how we test low light noise.

Apple iPhone 3G S Low Light Noise Comparisons

Apple iPhone 3G S
100% Crop

The iPhone 3G S maintained a good deal of sharpness in low light and its image didn’t have the discoloration or artifacting that was prominent on the Flip UltraHD (see above). Also notice how much crisper the vertical trumpet on the iPhone is compared to the Samsung Omnia which is completely distorted.

Low Light Noise Score Comparison
6
8
10
12
16
Low Light Noise Score

The iPhone continued its strong color performance in our low light testing. The phone managed a color error of 3.38 in low light, which is actually a slightly better score than it earned in our bright light testing. The phone measured a saturation level of 110% in this test, which is nearly identical to its bright light performance. More on how we test low light color.

Low Light Color Accuracy Performance
Color Error Map
The map on the left is a diagram of the color error. The length and direction of each line indicates how the camera processed each particular color while capturing video.

The Apple iPhone 3G S produced a color error of and a saturation level of in our bright light color testing.

The iPhone 3G S was the best low light color performer in this set. It captured vivid, saturated colors, just like it did in bright light. This time, however, colors were even more accurate. The phone still had the most trouble with red colors and it continued to capture blues and purples with a high level of accuracy (see Color Error Map above).

The Sony MHS-PM1 had the closest color accuracy to the iPhone 3G S, but it was still nearly a full point behind. It also lacked the saturation that the iPhone’s colors had. The Flip UltraHD had pretty good saturation (also 110%), but its image had a slight green/yellow hue in our low light testing.

Low Light Color Score Comparison
5
6
7
8
9
12
Low Light Color Score

Shop for the Apple iPhone 3G S

Advertisement

Shop for the Apple iPhone 3G S

Loading Recently Viewed Products
Advertisement

Latest News
& Reviews

Top Rated Camcorders

  • Canon  Vixia HF G10
    Canon  Vixia HF G10
    $1,499.99
    1

    Canon Vixia HF G10

    With the Vixia HF G10 ($1499 MSRP), Canon's latest flagship camcorder, the company decided to use a completely different image sensor with a smaller amount of pixels. If you check out the results from our performance testing, you'll quickly see the change paid off—particularly in low light situations. Read full 5-part review

    $1,499.99
    Any Type
    Consumer
    Any Media Type
    Internal Flash Memory
  • Panasonic HDC-TM900
    Panasonic HDC-TM900
    $1,099.00
    2

    Panasonic HDC-TM900

    The Panasonic HDC-TM900 is the successor to the lauded HDC-TM700, our pick for Camcorder of the Year in 2010. The TM900 offers the same fantastic video performance as its predecessor, particularly with its widely-praised 1080/60p mode, but Panasonic didn't improve on much else. Read full 5-part review

    $1,099.00
    Any Type
    Consumer
    Any Media Type
    Internal Flash Memory
  • Panasonic HC-X900M
    Panasonic HC-X900M
    $999.00
    3

    Panasonic HC-X900M

    The HC-X900M is the replacement for last year's HDC-TM900 flagship HD camcorder from Panasonic, but if you're looking for hot new features or exciting updates then you should prepare to be disappointed. Other than a few design alterations and some slight tweaks to the lens and sensor, the HC-X900 is identical to its predecessor. Read full 5-part review

    $999.00
    Any Type
    Consumer
    Any Media Type
    Internal Flash Memory
  • Canon  Vixia HF M40
    Canon  Vixia HF M40
    $599.99
    4

    Canon Vixia HF M40

    The Canon HF M40 is the latest mid-range camcorder from Canon. With the same risky new sensor, this impressive bargain has great low light performance and a plethora of manual controls. Read full 5-part review

    $599.99
    Any Type
    Consumer
    Any Media Type
  • Sony  Handycam HDR-TD10
    Sony  Handycam HDR-TD10
    $1,499.00
    5

    Sony Handycam HDR-TD10

    The twin lens system featured prominently on the front of the Sony HDR-TD10 should tell you one thing: this is a camcorder that can record 3D video. Read full 5-part review

    $1,499.00
    Any Type
    Consumer
    Any Media Type
    Internal Flash Memory

Features

Advertisement
Apple iPhone 3G S
Camcorder Review

Previous: Page 4

Color Performance