-
Introduction
-
01.Design
-
02.Product Tour
-
03.Performance
-
04.Color Performance
-
05.Low Light Performance
-
06.Motion Performance
-
07.Sharpness Performance
-
08.Sample Videos
-
09.Usability
-
10.Ease of Use
-
11.Handling
-
12.Controls
-
13.Features
-
14.Recording Options
-
15.Hardware
-
16.Other Features
-
17.JVC GZ-MG670 Comparison
-
18.Samsung SMX-F34 Comparison
-
19.Panasonic SDR-S26 Comparison
-
20.Conclusion
-
21.Photo Gallery
-
22.Specs & Ratings
-
23.Comments
Canon FS200
Previous: Page 5
Low Light PerformanceNext: Page 7
Sharpness PerformanceMotion Performance
Motion (3.50)
Poor motion performance is one of the biggest problems with cheap standard definition camcorders. These cams simply don’t capture video with the amount of detail that HD camcorders do, and their motion videos show far more signs of artifacting, frequency interference, and lack of sharpness. None of these camcorders, including the Canon FS200, offer any alternate frame rate recording options (like 24p or 30p). All of Canon’s HD models include 24p and 30p record modes.
Among the SD camcorders we tested, the Canon FS200 appeared to have an average motion rendering performance. The video didn’t look very bad compared to similar models, although there was a lot of artifacting present. We found the Canon FS200’s motion video to look very similar to the Panasonic SDR-S26’s test footage.
The JVC GZ-MG670 had the best looking motion video among the SD camcorders we tested. This may partially be due to the camcorder’s HD upconversion feature that allows for 1080p output via an HDMI cable. This does not mean the camcorder records HD video, it just has the ability to output the SD video as a 1080p signal via HDMI. Since the quality of HDMI cable is so much better than regular Composite AV cables, this may be why the JVC GZ-MG670’s video looked better on our HDTV. Still, the MG670’s motion didn’t look that much better than the other standard definition camcorders, it just had slightly less artifacting and interference.
The Samsung SMX-F34 managed one of the sharper images amongst the SD camcorders we tested, but it had some severe problems with motion rendering. There was a ton of artifacting in its test video and we saw lots of pixelation forming on both rotating pinwheels. This is likely due to the lower bitrate used by the Samsung compared to the other models shown here (the Samsung records at a maximum bitrate of 5Mbps, while the other models record approximately 9Mbps). The footage was rather smooth, but all of these camcorders appeared to capture smooth motion.
The Panasonic SDR-S26 captured similar motion to the Canon FS200, although its image looked a bit brighter and had more color saturation. Both camcorders showed nearly identical levels of artifacting and each captured a fairly smooth image. More on how we test motion.
Shop for the Canon FS200
Latest News
& Reviews
-
16-May-2012
Panasonic HC-V500M Camcorder Review
The Panasonic HC-V500M is a small, lightweight, budget camcorder that offers a lot for its $499 MSRP. Read More...
-
04-May-2012
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Digital Camera Reivew
Along with its retro design and weather-sealed body, the Olympus E-M5 features a robust movie mode that provides you with a variety of manual video controls and features. Read More...
Top Rated Camcorders
-

$1,499.991Canon Vixia HF G10
With the Vixia HF G10 ($1499 MSRP), Canon's latest flagship camcorder, the company decided to use a completely different image sensor with a smaller amount of pixels. If you check out the results from our performance testing, you'll quickly see the change paid off—particularly in low light situations. Read full 5-part review
$1,499.99Any TypeConsumerAny Media TypeInternal Flash Memory -

$1,099.002Panasonic HDC-TM900
The Panasonic HDC-TM900 is the successor to the lauded HDC-TM700, our pick for Camcorder of the Year in 2010. The TM900 offers the same fantastic video performance as its predecessor, particularly with its widely-praised 1080/60p mode, but Panasonic didn't improve on much else. Read full 5-part review
$1,099.00Any TypeConsumerAny Media TypeInternal Flash Memory -

$999.003Panasonic HC-X900M
The HC-X900M is the replacement for last year's HDC-TM900 flagship HD camcorder from Panasonic, but if you're looking for hot new features or exciting updates then you should prepare to be disappointed. Other than a few design alterations and some slight tweaks to the lens and sensor, the HC-X900 is identical to its predecessor. Read full 5-part review
$999.00Any TypeConsumerAny Media TypeInternal Flash Memory -

$599.994Canon Vixia HF M40
The Canon HF M40 is the latest mid-range camcorder from Canon. With the same risky new sensor, this impressive bargain has great low light performance and a plethora of manual controls. Read full 5-part review
$599.99Any TypeConsumerAny Media Type -

$1,499.005Sony Handycam HDR-TD10
The twin lens system featured prominently on the front of the Sony HDR-TD10 should tell you one thing: this is a camcorder that can record 3D video. Read full 5-part review
$1,499.00Any TypeConsumerAny Media TypeInternal Flash Memory
Features
-
An Introduction to High Definition Video.
Understand what’s going on in the world of HD camcorders so you can make sense of it all and make an informed decision on your next purchase. Read More...
-
CamcorderInfo.com 2010 Selects Awards
Our awards for the best camcorders in 2010. Read More...
-
The Student Filmmaker's Buying Guide To Consumer Camcorders
For the student filmmaker, finding the right camcorder can be a very arduous task. This article goes through the best consumer camcorders on the market for the student filmmaker, and all of these models can be found for $1500 or less. Read More...
-
Video Editing Software For Your Camcorder
Most consumer camcorders come with some kind of editing program, but the quality of this provided software can range drastically. This article offers an overview and critique for these editing programs. Read More...
(add your own)