Canon FS200 Camcorder Review

by Jeremy Stamas
Published on Nov 13, 2009 1:00 PM

 
Intro Product Tour
Color & Noise Performance Motion & Sharpness Performance
Low Light Performance Compression & Media
Manual Controls Still Features
Handling & Use Playback & Connectivity
Audio & Other Features JVC GZ-MG670 Comparison
Samsung SMX-F34 Comparison
Panasonic SDR-S26 Comparison
Conclusion Photo Gallery
Specs and Ratings


Canon FS200 versus Panasonic SDR-S26
The Panasonic SDR-S26 • The Panasonic SDR-S26 has two standout features: a 70x optical zoom and optical image stabilization.
• Other than those two features, the SDR-S26 is a lackluster camcorder that didn't perform well in our sharpness or low light sensitivity tests.
• The Panasonic is a bit cheaper than the Canon FS200, but its image quality is a lot worse.
previous Samsung SMX-F34 Comparison (Page 14 of 17) Conclusion

The Panasonic SDR-S26 has a few things going for it that make it stand out in the standard definition market. The first is its 70x optical zoom, which is almost twice as long as the zoom on the Canon FS200 (37x). This is a ridiculous amount of optical zoom, however, and we can't really imagine why anyone would need to zoom in that much. Anyway, if you are a zoom fanatic, then the Panasonic SDR-S26 was designed for you.

In addition to its killer zoom ratio, the SDR-S26 also offers optical image stabilization. This system is advantageous over the rest of these SD models that all offer digital stabilization systems. Panasonic's optical system works better (it scored the highest in our testing), and it doesn't degrade your image quality like digital stabilization systems can. So, a good stabilization system combined with that 70x optical zoom does make the Panasonic S26 ideal forgetting a close-up of a far-away animal—or for spying on your neighbors.

Despite these two enticing features, the Panasonic SDR-S26 is a mediocre camcorder when it comes to video performance. It performed terribly in our low light sensitivity test, had the worst sharpness of the bunch (and the smallest image sensor), managed an abysmal battery life, and its image appeared fuzzy and bland in anything less than ideal lighting conditions. It is also a stout little camcorder that feels comfortable to hold, but doesn't look nearly as stylish as the Canon FS200. The Panasonic SDR-S26 is roughly $30 cheaper than the Canon, but the money you save is reflected by the camcorder's poor video quality.

You can go with the Panasonic if all you want is a camcorder that allows you to zoom to your heart's content, or if you are insistent of having optical image stabilization. If you are at all concerned about image quality or low light performance, however, we suggest you go with the Canon FS200, JVC GZ-MG670, or Sony DCR-SX60—all of them outperformed the Panasonic in our video testing by a significant margin.

  Comparison Specs
  The Canon FS200
  Canon FS200 Panasonic SDR-S26
Price $299 $269
Primary Recording Media SD/SDHC memory card SD/SDHC memory card
Secondary Recording Media None None
Image Sensor 1/6-inch CCD 1/8-inch CCD
Effective Pixel Count 450,000 pixels 380,000 pixels
Mic Input Yes, 3.5mm None
LCD 2.7-inch with 123,000 pixels 2.7-inch with 123,200 pixels
Viewfinder None None
Weight 286g (10.1 ounces) with battery 257g (9 ounces) with battery
Dimensions 56 x 58 x 122mm (2.2 x 2.3 x 4.8 inches) 56 x 65 x 107 (2.21 x 2.56 x 4.21 inches)
HD No No
Frame Rates 60i 60i
Compression MPEG-2 MPEG-2
Maximum Bitrate 9Mbps 10Mbps
Optical Zoom 37x Optical, 41x Advanced Zoom 70x Optical
Stabilization Digital Optical

 

 

  Scores
  Canon FS200 Panasonic SDR-S26
Color 10.14 9.54
Noise 6.4 6.34
Video Sharpness 3.51 3.18
Low Light Sensitivity 4.96 1.67
Low Light Color 5.67 7.13
Low Light Noise 11.24 9.94
Stabilization 1.3 6.85
Battery Life (in minutes) 197 82

 

Low Light Comparison
100% crops at 60 lux
Canon
FS200
Panasonic
SDR-S26

 

Stabilization Score Comparison
stabilization score comparison chart

 



<< Samsung SMX-F34 Comparison | Conclusion >>