-
Introduction
-
01.Design
-
02.Product Tour
-
03.Performance
-
04.Color Performance
-
05.Low Light Performance
-
06.Motion Performance
-
07.Sharpness Performance
-
08.Sample Videos
-
09.Usability
-
10.Ease of Use
-
11.Handling
-
12.Controls
-
13.Features
-
14.Recording Options
-
15.Hardware
-
16.Other Features
-
17.JVC GZ-HM400 Comparison
-
18.Panasonic HDC-TM300 Comparison
-
19.Sony HDR-XR520V Comparison
-
20.Conclusion
-
21.Photo Gallery
-
22.Specs & Ratings
-
23.Comments
Canon Vixia HF S11
Previous: Page 10
Ease of UseNext: Page 12
ControlsHandling
Custom control dial is great; camcorder is comfortable in the hand. New stabilization system doesn’t really show marked improvement; frustrating three-menu system.
Handling (7.45)
The Canon HF S11 has the same design elements of the HF S10 and HF S100 released earlier this year. Compared to last year’s models, there’s just a couple of new features. The most significant of these upgrades is Canon’s new custom control dial, which gives users a smooth and more exact method for making focus, exposure, and audio level adjustments. We’re big fans of the new dial, especially compared to Canon’s tiny joystick controls of yore.
The control dial really streamlines the image adjustment process, giving you easier access to your most commonly used option. Unfortunately, it isn’t quite as simple to use as we would like. In order to switch the dial’s function, you have to delve into the admin menu. That means you can’t just switch controls on the fly, as you could with the lens ring on last year’s Panasonics or the dial on 2008 and 2009 Sony models.
This year’s Canons have more than just the dial to set them apart from the 2008 lineup. The form factor has also changed significantly, with a new, larger lens that completely dominates the body. This makes the HF S11 a very comfortable camcorder to hold: the absence of a bulky hard drive means that it fits nicely in your palm, while the large lens barrel give you something substantial to grip. The contours aren’t as pleasant or comfortable as those on the Panasonic HDC-TM300, but it’s an enjoyable handling experience nonetheless.
This design makes the HF S11 easy to hold, but like the HF S10 and HF S100 before it, the resulting location of the accessory shoe is inconvenient. The front of the camcorder may be a common location now for accessory shoes, but we prefer the position that was on last year’s Canon models: pushed further back, your accessories won’t be quite such an obstruction to proper grip and won’t weight down the front of your camcorder.
Rounding out the excellent grip on the HF S11 is Canon’s nicely padded hand strap. The soft suede lining on the interior and a decent amount of cushioning should make long shoots easy on the hand.
We have few complaints with the button layout of the HF S11. Most of the switches and buttons respond well and are conveniently located. The joystick, however, is one area that could use improvement. It may be better than some joysticks we’ve seen, but it is still small and finicky. With a menu structure that’s already a bit more complex than it should be, this tiny joystick doesn’t help matters.
Portability (6.15)
In practice, the Canon HF S11 is as portable as any other consumer camcorder: it’s too big to fit in your pocket and small enough to slip into a camera bag or purse. If you’re the sort of person that carries your camcorder around on a regular basis, however, you will notice that the HF S11 is larger than many of its competitors. This is thanks, in large part, to the sizable lens barrel dominating the body of the camcorder. It’s a larger lens than anything you’ll find on the top-of-the-line models from Sony, Panasonic, or JVC.
As a result, the Canon is slightly larger than the Panasonic HDC-TM300 or the JVC GZ-HD300. The result is a camcorder that’s not quite as comfortable to hold as the TM300, but fits better in your hand than the slim HD300. It is certainly more comfortable to hold than most hard drive camcorders this year, especially the Sony HDR-XR520V. On the other hand, the 64GB of internal flash memory can’t quite compete with the 240GB of hard drive space on the XR520. The difference really shouldn’t impact portability, since we would recommend you backup your footage at least every 64GB anyway.
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Canon Vixia HF S11 | JVC GZ-HM400 | |
| Dimensions | 70.0mm x 69.0mm x 136.0mm | 67.0mm x 72.0mm x 141.0mm |
| Weight (w/ battery) | 500.00g | 485.00g |
| Weight (w/o battery) |
Battery Life (5.00)
The Canon HF S11 didn’t have a very impressive battery life with its provided battery, but its performance was average for a camcorder of its class. It lasted for 99 minutes and 43 seconds in our test (1 hour, 39 minutes, 43 seconds), which is slightly worse than the Panasonic HDC-TM300 and a bit better than the Sony HDR-XR520V. The JVC GZ-HM400 trounced the competition in this test, lasting for 163 minutes with its supplied battery pack. More on how we test battery life.
This is also nearly identical to the battery life on the card-only Canon HF S100, which went for 98 minutes in our test. All these camcorders do have the benefit of open battery compartments. This means you can purchase and use larger battery packs that should give you increased battery life when recording. Canon specifically sells the larger BP-819 and BP-827 battery packs, both of which are compatible with the HF S11.
LCD (7.88)
The Canon HF S100 has a 2.7-inch LCD screen with a 211,000-pixel resolution. The camcorder has no electronic viewfinder, so you’ll likely run into trouble framing your image on a bright, sunny day. The LCD’s design is rather interesting. It is completely flat and glossy, which means the entire LCD panel is a single, even pane. Most camcorders, including Canon’s mid-range models (like the HF20), feature an LCD screen that is recessed by a few millimeters. We feel this indentation helps to protect the screen from aggressive glare, whereas the glossy surface of the HF S11 attracts more glare.
Still, the LCD panel on the HF S11 looks very sleek, and, in most lighting conditions, it doesn’t pose a problem with glare reflection. There are a few buttons at the bottom of the panel that serve dual purposes. In playback mode, the first three buttons represent VCR controls. In shooting mode, the first button will start/stop record, while the next two can be used to zoom. The button farthest to the right switches between shooting mode and playback mode. We like the design of these buttons very much and they are some of the best LCD panel buttons we’ve seen on a consumer camcorder.
One more button and a joystick are located to the far left of the LCD panel. The Function button brings up—unsurprisingly—the Function menu, and the joystick is used to navigate through menus and access the joystick guide.
| Feature | Canon Vixia HF S11 | JVC GZ-HM400 | Panasonic HDC-TM300 | Sony HDR-XR520V |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display Size | 2.7 in. | 2.8 in. | 2.7 in. | 3.2 in. |
| Display Resolution | 211000 pixels | 207000 pixels | 230400 pixels | 921000 pixels |
| Touch Screen | ✗ |
✗ |
✓ |
✓ |
| Viewfinder | ✗ |
✗ |
✓ |
✓ |

Stabilization (4.43)
The HF S11 didn’t perform tremendously well in our stabilization testing, even with its new stabilization setting. The camcorder is equipped with an optical image stabilization system (OIS). The two settings are Standard (the same stabilization that was featured on the HF S10 and HF S100) and Dynamic (new to the HF S11). The Dynamic setting is said to accommodate for more intense camcorder shake and, according to Canon, should work better across the zoom range.
In our low shake test the camcorder managed to reduce 23% of the shake using Standard OIS and 30% using Dynamic OIS. When we cranked things up to high shake, the Standard OIS reduced 21% of the shake and the Dynamic OIS reduced 27%. These aren’t horrid numbers, but we expected better from such a wide, bulky camcorder that is equipped with two levels of optical image stabilization. More on how we test stabilization.
The charts above show how much the HF S11 shook during our stabilization testing. The blue lines represent the movement of the image without stabilization, while the orange lines show the movement with image stabilization turned on (in Standard mode). As you can see, the OIS didn’t do a very good job in correcting the shake.
The video above is an example of the Canon’s stabilization capability at low shake levels. When watching this video you can notice a slight improvement with Dynamic OIS engaged as opposed to Standard, but the difference is very minimal. Overall, the stabilization system on the HF S11 didn’t perform as well as the JVC GZ-HM400, Panasonic HDC-TM300, or the Sony HDR-XR520V.
Latest News
& Reviews
-
04-May-2012
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Digital Camera Reivew
Along with its retro design and weather-sealed body, the Olympus E-M5 features a robust movie mode that provides you with a variety of manual video controls and features. Read More...
-
01-May-2012
Sony Alpha NEX-C3 Digital Camera Review
The Alpha NEX-C3 is the cheapest of Sony’s NEX interchangeable lens cameras. Read More...
Top Rated Camcorders
-

$1,499.991Canon Vixia HF G10
With the Vixia HF G10 ($1499 MSRP), Canon's latest flagship camcorder, the company decided to use a completely different image sensor with a smaller amount of pixels. If you check out the results from our performance testing, you'll quickly see the change paid off—particularly in low light situations. Read full 5-part review
$1,499.99Any TypeConsumerAny Media TypeInternal Flash Memory -

$1,099.002Panasonic HDC-TM900
The Panasonic HDC-TM900 is the successor to the lauded HDC-TM700, our pick for Camcorder of the Year in 2010. The TM900 offers the same fantastic video performance as its predecessor, particularly with its widely-praised 1080/60p mode, but Panasonic didn't improve on much else. Read full 5-part review
$1,099.00Any TypeConsumerAny Media TypeInternal Flash Memory -

$999.003Panasonic HC-X900M
The HC-X900M is the replacement for last year's HDC-TM900 flagship HD camcorder from Panasonic, but if you're looking for hot new features or exciting updates then you should prepare to be disappointed. Other than a few design alterations and some slight tweaks to the lens and sensor, the HC-X900 is identical to its predecessor. Read full 5-part review
$999.00Any TypeConsumerAny Media TypeInternal Flash Memory -

$599.994Canon Vixia HF M40
The Canon HF M40 is the latest mid-range camcorder from Canon. With the same risky new sensor, this impressive bargain has great low light performance and a plethora of manual controls. Read full 5-part review
$599.99Any TypeConsumerAny Media Type -

$1,499.005Sony Handycam HDR-TD10
The twin lens system featured prominently on the front of the Sony HDR-TD10 should tell you one thing: this is a camcorder that can record 3D video. Read full 5-part review
$1,499.00Any TypeConsumerAny Media TypeInternal Flash Memory
Features
-
An Introduction to High Definition Video.
Understand what’s going on in the world of HD camcorders so you can make sense of it all and make an informed decision on your next purchase. Read More...
-
CamcorderInfo.com 2010 Selects Awards
Our awards for the best camcorders in 2010. Read More...
-
The Student Filmmaker's Buying Guide To Consumer Camcorders
For the student filmmaker, finding the right camcorder can be a very arduous task. This article goes through the best consumer camcorders on the market for the student filmmaker, and all of these models can be found for $1500 or less. Read More...
-
Video Editing Software For Your Camcorder
Most consumer camcorders come with some kind of editing program, but the quality of this provided software can range drastically. This article offers an overview and critique for these editing programs. Read More...




(add your own)