JVC Everio GZ-HM340 Camcorder Review
JVC GZ-HM200 Comparison
Prev
Page 12 of 17
Next
News
- Sony Releases New Bloggie Camcorders With Touchscreens: the MHS-TS20 and MHS-TS10 - September 01, 2010
- Canon Announces New Compact Professional Camcorders—the XF105 and the XF100 - August 31, 2010
- JVC Announces New Ultracompact Picsio Camcorders: the GC-WP10 and GC-FM2 - August 23, 2010
- Samsung Unveils Another 'Flip-Killer': The HMX-E10 With Swivel Lens and Touchscreen LCD - July 28, 2010
Top Lab Tested Camcorders
Latest Reviews
- Canon XF105 First Impressions Camcorder Review - September 02, 2010
- Panasonic G2 DSLR Camera Review - August 31, 2010
- Panasonic HM-TA1 Camcorder Review - August 26, 2010
- Sanyo Xacti VPC-CS1 Camcorder Review - August 13, 2010
- Sanyo Announces Full HD Waterproof Camcorder: The VPC-CA102 - August 05, 2010
| JVC GZ-HM340 versus JVC GZ-HM200 | ||||
• The GZ-HM340 and GZ-HM200 performed on a similar level, despite their different CMOS sensors.• We feel the HM200 is the better camcorder—it felt stronger, has more manual controls, and it did better in our stabilization test. • The GZ-HM340 does have some extra features, however, like Time Lapse Record and Auto Record. • The HM200 features two SD/SDHC card slots, but no internal memory. |
||||
|
Audio & Other Features | (Page 12 of 17) | Panasonic HDC-TM10 Comparison | |
Even though it came out last year, the JVC GZ-HM200 is really not much different than the GZ-HM340. Despite the fact that the camcorders have different CMOS sensors, the two models performed similarly in our testing. The GZ-HM340 came out on top in low light, while the GZ-HM200 had better still image performance and stronger color accuracy in bright light. It's somewhat tough to pick a winner between these two when it comes to performance.
The GZ-HM200 does have a few more manual controls than the GZ-HM340, although it is missing features like Time Lapse Record and Auto Record that are both available on the HM340. One of the few concrete advantages of the GZ-HM340 is the fact that it contains 16GB of internal flash memory compared to none on the HM200. The GZ-HM200 does have two SD/SDHC card slots, however, and it has the same seamless recording function that is featured on the GZ-HM340.
The design of these two models is nearly identical, with the HM340 being a tad smaller and roughly 50g lighter than the HM200. If you're shopping based on price, you probably won't notice much of a difference either—the GZ-HM200 lists around $60 more than the GZ-HM340, but you can probably find an HM200 on the cheap if you shop around.
Overall, we'd probably have to give the GZ-HM200 the advantage here. It was, after all, our pick for best mid-range camcorder last year. We simply didn't feel JVC made any significant improvements with the GZ-HM340 for it to warrant higher praise than the GZ-HM200. Is the GZ-HM340 still a good entry-level or mid-range model? Sure, but we like the GZ-HM200 a little more.
| Comparison Specs | ||
![]() |
![]() |
|
| JVC GZ-HM340 | JVC GZ-HM200 | |
| Price | $499.95 | $579.95 |
| Primary Recording Media | 16GB internal flash memory | SD/SDHC memory card |
| Secondary Recording Media | SD/SDHC memory card | SD/SDHC memory card (two slots) |
| Image Sensor | 1/5.8-inch CMOS | 1/4-inch |
| Effective Pixel Count | 1.09 megapixels | 2.8 megapixels |
| Mic Input | None | None |
| LCD | 2.7 inches with 123,000 pixels | 2.7 inches with 123,000 pixels |
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Weight | 255g (9 ounces) with battery | 310g (11 ounces) with battery |
| Dimensions | 52 x 62 x 110mm (2.1 x 2.4 x 4.3 inches) | 54.5 x 65 x 112.5mm (2.15 x 2.56 x 4.4 inches) |
| HD | Yes | Yes |
| Frame Rates | 1080/60i | 1080/60i |
| Compression | MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 (AVCHD) | MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 (AVCHD) |
| Maximum Bitrate | 24Mbps | 24Mbps |
| Optical Zoom | 20x | 20x |
| Stabilization | Digital (with two settings) | Digital |
| Scores | ||
| JVC GZ-HM340 | JVC GZ-HM200 | |
| Color | 10.8 | 18.13 |
| Noise | 10.06 | 9.65 |
| Video Sharpness | 10.19 | 8.89 |
| Low Light Sensitivity | 1.67 | 0.31 |
| Low Light Color | 8.28 | 7.09 |
| Low Light Noise | 11.66 | 9.24 |
| Stabilization | 3.22 | 8.25 |
| 100% Crop Comparisons at 3000 Lux | |
![]() |
![]() |
| JVC GZ-HM340 100% Crop |
JVC GZ-HM200 100% Crop |
| Low Light Color Score Comparison |
![]() |
• The GZ-HM340 and GZ-HM200 performed on a similar level, despite their different CMOS sensors.




