or Browse:
Type
Brand
Price
Need

JVC GZ-HM340

Camcorder Review

Previous: Page 4

Color Performance
Page 5

Low Light Performance

Color accuracy and noise levels in low light were both very good. Low light sensitivity needs improvement.

The GZ-HM340 did better in our low light sensitivity tests than previous JVC camcorders, but its performance still wasn’t very good. The camcorder required 20 lux of light to reach 50 IRE on our waveform monitor, which is below average—even if it is better than some of the other camcorders in this set. Ideally, we like to see a mid-range HD camcorder have a low light sensitivity that is under 15 lux. More on how we test low light sensitivity.

Of the camcorders in this set, only the Samsung HMX-H106 earned a decent score in this test. Still, the improvement of the GZ-HM340 over last year’s GZ-HM200 shows that low light sensitivity is an issue JVC is trying to correct. As always, we conducted this test with the GZ-HM340’s auto slow shutter turned off (but the camcorder’s auto gain control was left on). If you leave the auto slow shutter turned on you will get better low light sensitivity, but your images may appear blurred or choppy due to the 1/30 shutter speed.

Low Light Sensitivity Comparison
0
1
2
3
4
5
Low Light Sensitivity Score

The JVC GZ-HM340 was a top-notch performer in our low light color test. The camcorder averaged just 0.7425% noise in low light, which is only slightly more noise than the camcorder measured in bright light (this is a good thing). The Panasonic HDC-TM10 had similar results in this test, while the JVC GZ-HM200 had some slightly higher noise levels. The Samsung HMX-H106 was the worst camcorder in this set when it came to noise, but it also captured the sharpest image by far. More on how we test low light noise.

JVC GZ-HM340 Low Light Noise Comparisons

JVC GZ-HM340
100% Crop

While the JVC GZ-HM340 didn’t register much noise in our test, its low light image was not very sharp. You can see from the crops above that the camcorder captured a blurred, fuzzy image in low light—although its image was actually crisper than that of the JVC GZ-HM200 and Panasonic HDC-TM10.

Low Light Noise Score Comparison
4
6
8
10
14
Low Light Noise Score

The GZ-HM340 did a lot better in our low light color and noise tests than it did in our low light sensitivity test. The camcorder managed a color error of 4.22 and a saturation level of 71.47% in this test, both of which are good scores. The saturation level is particularly high here, and it eclipsed the amount we measured on the three comparison camcorders. More on how we test low light color.

Low Light Color Accuracy Performance
Color Error Map
The map on the left is a diagram of the color error. The length and direction of each line indicates how the camera processed each particular color while capturing video.

The JVC GZ-HM340 produced a color error of and a saturation level of in our bright light color testing.

We want to stress how strong and vivid the GZ-HM340’s colors looked in our low light test; you should check out the comparison images below for a better idea of what we’re talking about. The JVC GZ-HM200 and Panasonic HDC-TM10 both look very washed out in comparison to the GZ-HM340, although the Samsung HMX-106 has deep colors that look similar to what the HM340 captured.

Low Light Color Score Comparison
2
4
6
8
12
Low Light Color Score

Shop for the JVC GZ-HM340

Advertisement

Shop for the JVC GZ-HM340

Loading Recently Viewed Products
Advertisement

Latest News
& Reviews

Top Rated Camcorders

  • Canon  Vixia HF G10
    Canon  Vixia HF G10
    $1,499.99
    1

    Canon Vixia HF G10

    With the Vixia HF G10 ($1499 MSRP), Canon's latest flagship camcorder, the company decided to use a completely different image sensor with a smaller amount of pixels. If you check out the results from our performance testing, you'll quickly see the change paid off—particularly in low light situations. Read full 5-part review

    $1,499.99
    Any Type
    Consumer
    Any Media Type
    Internal Flash Memory
  • Panasonic HDC-TM900
    Panasonic HDC-TM900
    $1,099.00
    2

    Panasonic HDC-TM900

    The Panasonic HDC-TM900 is the successor to the lauded HDC-TM700, our pick for Camcorder of the Year in 2010. The TM900 offers the same fantastic video performance as its predecessor, particularly with its widely-praised 1080/60p mode, but Panasonic didn't improve on much else. Read full 5-part review

    $1,099.00
    Any Type
    Consumer
    Any Media Type
    Internal Flash Memory
  • Panasonic HC-X900M
    Panasonic HC-X900M
    $999.00
    3

    Panasonic HC-X900M

    The HC-X900M is the replacement for last year's HDC-TM900 flagship HD camcorder from Panasonic, but if you're looking for hot new features or exciting updates then you should prepare to be disappointed. Other than a few design alterations and some slight tweaks to the lens and sensor, the HC-X900 is identical to its predecessor. Read full 5-part review

    $999.00
    Any Type
    Consumer
    Any Media Type
    Internal Flash Memory
  • Canon  Vixia HF M40
    Canon  Vixia HF M40
    $599.99
    4

    Canon Vixia HF M40

    The Canon HF M40 is the latest mid-range camcorder from Canon. With the same risky new sensor, this impressive bargain has great low light performance and a plethora of manual controls. Read full 5-part review

    $599.99
    Any Type
    Consumer
    Any Media Type
  • Sony  Handycam HDR-TD10
    Sony  Handycam HDR-TD10
    $1,499.00
    5

    Sony Handycam HDR-TD10

    The twin lens system featured prominently on the front of the Sony HDR-TD10 should tell you one thing: this is a camcorder that can record 3D video. Read full 5-part review

    $1,499.00
    Any Type
    Consumer
    Any Media Type
    Internal Flash Memory

Features

Advertisement
JVC GZ-HM340
Camcorder Review

Previous: Page 4

Color Performance