Nikon D300s

Introduction
The D300s is Nikon's newest video-capable DSLR. While the camera did show some impressive results in our low light testing, we were disappointed by the fact that Nikon didn't implement any new video features as compared to last year's D5000.
Color & Noise Performance
As is the norm for video-capable DSLRs, the Nikon D300s did a good job in our color accuracy test. The camera didn't produce as much color saturation as some other models, but this can be adjusted in the camera's menu system. Click here to read our full color performance review, including color swatches and crops.
| Color Accuracy Performance | |
![]() |
![]() |
| Color Test Chart (above), Color Error Map (right) | |
| The Nikon D300s produced a color error of 3.83 and a saturation level of 83.38% in our bright light color testing. (The map on the right is a diagram of the color error. The length and direction of each line indicates how the camcorder processed each particular color.) | |
The D300s also did a great job in our bright light noise test with the camera averaging just 0.2% noise. This, as with the camera's color accuracy performance, is on par with the top video-capable DSLRs on the market. Click here to read our full noise performance review, including crops and comparative analysis.
Motion & Sharpness
The D300s records all video with a 24p frame rate, which is the same frame rate used on last year's Nikon D5000. We weren't crazy about the way the D300s rendered motion, but the camera definitely did a better job than previous video-capable DSLRs from Nikon (the D90 and D5000). Click here to read our full motion performance review, including video clips.
Since the D300s can only capture video at a maximum resolution of 1280 x 720, the camera didn't have the sharpest image of the video-DSLRs we've tested. Both the Canon 7D and the Panasonic GH1—which we used as comparison models—can record a Full HD image (1920 x 1080). Click here to read our full sharpness performance review.
| Nikon D300s | Canon 7D | Nikon D5000 | Panasonic GH1 | |
| Horizontal Sharpness |
600 lw/ph | 575 lw/ph | 575 lw/ph | 750 lw/ph |
| Vertical Sharpness |
550 lw/ph | 700 lw/ph | 625 lw/ph | 650 lw/ph |
Low Light Performance
The D300s required just 7 lux of light to reach 50 IRE on our waveform monitor—a performance that is a bit better than last year's Nikon D5000. Overall, the D300s did quite well in our series of low light tests. Click here to read our full low light sensitivity performance review.
| Required Illumination * |
![]() |
| * the lower the lux required, the better the performance |
Color saturation increased on the D300s when we shot our low light test, while the camera's color accuracy dropped by only a smidgen compared to our bright light testing. Click here to read our full low light color performance review, including comparative images and analysis.
| Auto Low Light Color Performance | |
![]() |
![]() |
| Color Test Chart (above), Color Error Map (right) | |
| The Nikon D300s produced a color error of 4.04 and a saturation level of 95.73% in our low light color testing. (The map on the right is a diagram of the color error. The length and direction of each line indicates how the camcorder processed each particular color.) | |
Noise levels remained low for the D300s in our low light testing. The camera managed 0.625% noise in this test, which is roughly the same amount we measured on its comparison models. Click here to read our full low light noise performance review, including crops and comparative images.
Conclusion |
||||
The Nikon D300s is not the camera to get if you're serious about using a DSLR to record video. It doesn't have a good set of video controls and its overall video performance is far behind similarly-priced models from Canon and Panasonic. The fact that the D300s can't even record a Full HD image (its resolution tops out at 1280 x 720) is probably its biggest downside from a video perspective.The price of the D300s ($1699 body only) should also dissuade people who are simply looking for a DSLR with a video mode they can experiment with. Many other models—like the D5000 from Nikon or the E-P1 from Olympus—are available for less than half the price of the D300s. The video modes on these cheaper DSLRs are also not top-notch, but they aren't much different than what the D300s offers. Honestly, we can't see any reason to recommend the D300s based on its video performance or features. We're not saying the D300s is a bad camera, however, as this judgment is solely based on the model's video performance and capabilities. If you want to purchase a video-capable DSLR we recommend looking at the Canon 7D or Panasonic GH1 instead. |
||||
Exclusive - Read the full review of the Nikon D300s at DigitalCameraInfo.com, including complete, comprehensive video testing and analysis by CamcorderInfo.com. |
Shop for the Nikon D300s
Latest News
& Reviews
-
09-Feb-2012
Canon Vixia HF R32 First Impressions Review
With an expected price tag of around $550, the HF R32 is the most expensive of Canon’s entry-level Vixia camcorders. Read More...
-
04-Feb-2012
GoPro HD Hero2 Camcorder Review
If you’re looking for a hands-free adventure-cam, the Hero2 may be your savior. Read More...
Top Rated Camcorders
-

$1,149.001Panasonic HDC-SDT750
With the HDC-SDT750, Panasonic is bringing 3D videography to the masses. With its $1399 price tag the camcorder definitely isn’t cheap, but it is still comparable in cost to other flagship models. Read full 4-part review
$1,149.00Any TypeConsumerAny Media TypeMemory Card -

$2,121.952Canon Vixia HF G10
With the Vixia HF G10 ($1499 MSRP), Canon's latest flagship camcorder, the company decided to use a completely different image sensor with a smaller amount of pixels. If you check out the results from our performance testing, you'll quickly see the change paid off—particularly in low light situations. Read full 4-part review
$2,121.95Any TypeConsumerAny Media TypeInternal Flash Memory -

$719.993Panasonic HDC-TM900
The Panasonic HDC-TM900 is the successor to the lauded HDC-TM700, our pick for Camcorder of the Year in 2010. The TM900 offers the same fantastic video performance as its predecessor, particularly with its widely-praised 1080/60p mode, but Panasonic didn't improve on much else. Read full 4-part review
$719.99Any TypeConsumerAny Media TypeInternal Flash Memory -

$599.954Canon Vixia HF M40
The Canon HF M40 is the latest mid-range camcorder from Canon. With the same risky new sensor, this impressive bargain has great low light performance and a plethora of manual controls. Read full 4-part review
$599.95Any TypeConsumerAny Media Type -

$1,029.995Sony Handycam HDR-TD10
The twin lens system featured prominently on the front of the Sony HDR-TD10 should tell you one thing: this is a camcorder that can record 3D video. Read full 4-part review
$1,029.99Any TypeConsumerAny Media TypeInternal Flash Memory





The Nikon D300s is not the camera to get if you're serious about using a DSLR to record video. It doesn't have a good set of video controls and its overall video performance is far behind similarly-priced models from Canon and Panasonic. The fact that the D300s can't even record a Full HD image (its resolution tops out at 1280 x 720) is probably its biggest downside from a video perspective.
(add your own)