-
Introduction
-
01.Performance
-
02.Format
-
03.Auto / Manual Controls
-
04.Still Features
-
05.Handling and Use
-
06.Audio / Playback / Connectivity
-
07.Other Features
-
08.Conclusion & Comparisons
-
09.Photo Gallery
-
10.Specs and Ratings
-
11.Comments
Flip Video Flip Mino
Previous: Page 9
Photo GalleryNext: Page 11
Comments
Specs and Ratings
| Pure Digital Flip Mino Specs | |
|---|---|
| Year | 2008 |
| Format | Flash Memory |
| Class | Consumer |
| High Definition | No |
| General Type | Ultracompact, Basic Budget |
| Sensor Size (in.) | 1/4 |
| Sensor Count | 1 |
| Gross Pixel Count Video | 0.31 |
| Progressive Scan (output) | No |
| Still Pixel Shifting | 0.0 |
| Filter Diameter (mm) | 0.0 |
| Focal Distance Minimum (mm) | 0.0 |
| Focal Distance Maximum (mm) | 0.0 |
| 35mm Focal Distance Minimum (mm) | 0.0 |
| 35mm Focal Distance Maximum (mm) | 0.0 |
| F-stop Minimum | 2.4 |
| F-stop Maximum | 2.4 |
| Minimum Lux (reported) | 0.0 |
| Firewire | No |
| Composite (RCA) In | No |
| Composite (RCA) Out | Yes |
| S-Video In | No |
| S-Video Out | No |
| Component In | No |
| Component Out | No |
| Microphone In | No |
| Headphone Out | No |
| XLR In | No |
| Control L | No |
| Weight (gram) | 94.0 |
| Accessory Shoe | No |
| Accessory Shoe Hot | No |
| LCD Size (in.) | 1.5 |
| LCD Resolution (Pixels) | 70000 |
| Hybrid (Non-Solarizing) LCD | Yes |
| Viewfinder Type | None |
| Viewfinder Resolution (Pixels) | 0.00 |
| Included Battery Life (min.) | 154 |
| Recording Quality Options | No options |
| Max Recording Time (min.) | 60.0 |
| Webcam | No |
| Included Remote Control | No |
| Other Manual Controls | None |
| Original Price | 179 |
| Year | 2008 |
| Format | Flash Memory |
| Class | Consumer |
| HD | No |
| General Type | Ultracompact, Basic Budget |
| Manual Focus | No |
| Manual Exposure | No |
| Manual Aperture | No |
| Manual Shutter Speed | No |
| Manual White Balance | No |
| Manual Gain | No |
| Manual Noise Reduction | No |
| Audio Dubbing | No |
| Auto / Easy Mode | Yes |
| Still-Video Hybrid | No |
| Waterproof | No |
| Pure Digital Flip Mino Scores | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rating | Score | Weighting | |
| Video Performance Score | 1.5 | 4.0 | |
| Video Resolution Score | 4.5 | 1.5 | |
| Low Light Performance Score | 9.54 | 4.0 | |
| Front Score | 3.5 | 0.2 | |
| Back Score | 5.25 | 0.25 | |
| Left Score | 3.25 | 0.2 | |
| Right Score | 3.25 | 0.3 | |
| Top Score | 5.0 | 0.15 | |
| Automatic Controls Score | 4.5 | 0.5 | |
| Overall Manual Controls Score | 0.25 | 0.6 | |
| Zoom Power/Ratio Score | 0.0 | 0.5 | |
| Exposure and Aperture Score | 0.0 | 0.65 | |
| Still Performance Score | 0.0 | 1.2 | |
| Still Resolution Score | 0.0 | 1.0 | |
| Menu Score | 6.5 | 1.0 | |
| LCD and Viewfinder Score | 2.0 | 0.6 | |
| Battery Life Score | 7.7 | 1.0 | |
| Audio Score | 3.0 | 1.0 | |
| Value Score | 8.0 | 1.25 | |
| Total: | 142 | ||
Shop for the Pure Digital Flip Mino
Latest News
& Reviews
-
16-May-2012
Panasonic HC-V500M Camcorder Review
The Panasonic HC-V500M is a small, lightweight, budget camcorder that offers a lot for its $499 MSRP. Read More...
-
04-May-2012
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Digital Camera Reivew
Along with its retro design and weather-sealed body, the Olympus E-M5 features a robust movie mode that provides you with a variety of manual video controls and features. Read More...
Top Rated
Features
-
An Introduction to High Definition Video.
Understand what’s going on in the world of HD camcorders so you can make sense of it all and make an informed decision on your next purchase. Read More...
-
CamcorderInfo.com 2010 Selects Awards
Our awards for the best camcorders in 2010. Read More...
-
The Student Filmmaker's Buying Guide To Consumer Camcorders
For the student filmmaker, finding the right camcorder can be a very arduous task. This article goes through the best consumer camcorders on the market for the student filmmaker, and all of these models can be found for $1500 or less. Read More...
-
Video Editing Software For Your Camcorder
Most consumer camcorders come with some kind of editing program, but the quality of this provided software can range drastically. This article offers an overview and critique for these editing programs. Read More...
(add your own)