or Browse:
Type
Brand
Price
Need

Flip Video Flip UltraHD

Camcorder Review

Previous: Page 3

Performance
Page 4

Color Performance

Very low noise and better color accuracy than MinoHD. Isn’t great compared to most consumer camcorders.

For a cheap, ultra-compact camcorder, the Flip UltraHD did rather well on our bright light color test. The camcorder registered a color error of 5.42 and a saturation level of 114.5%. While these scores are no match for a traditional HD camcorder, it is roughly on par with the Sony MHS-CM1 (Webbie HD). This color error is a significant improvement over the Flip MinoHD, which measured a horrendous 15.76 color error in our test. More on how we test color.

Color Accuracy Performance
Color Error Map
The map on the left is a diagram of the color error. The length and direction of each line indicates how the camera processed each particular color while capturing video.

The Pure Digital Flip UltraHD produced a color error of 5.42 and a saturation level of 114.5% in our bright light color testing.

In the color error map above, you can see specifically what colors gave the Flip UltraHD the most trouble. The camcorder did well with greens and yellows, but had a lot of trouble blues, purples, and reds. The camcorder’s entire image in this test also appeared to have a slight greenish-yellow tint. Since there is no manual white balance on the Flip UltraHD, this discoloration is likely due to the camcorder having difficulty compensating for our bright light setup. Below is some sample color footage taken under the same 3000 lux light setup as our color test.

Auto

100% Crop

As you can see in the comparisons below, the Flip UltraHD and Sony MHS-CM1 captured far more accurate colors than both the Flip MinoHD and Kodak Zi6 in our testing. The MinoHD and Zi6 have very warm, orange tones that are likely a result of an inability of the camcorders to properly white balance for our testing lamps. The Sony MHS-CM1 slightly edges the Flip UltraHD as far as color accuracy is concerned, but it isn’t that much better.

Pure Digital Flip UltraHD Color Comparisons

Pure Digital Flip UltraHD

The close-up color comparisons below give you a better idea of the color reproduction each camcorder is capable of. The Sony MHS-CM1 may have the best color accuracy, but its color squares are full of artifacts. Here, you can also see how much of an orange tint the Kodak Zi6 and Flip MinoHD have.

Close-Up Color Comparisons Expand
Pure Digital Flip UltraHD
Sony MHS-CM1
Pure Digital Flip MinoHD
Kodak Zi6
Ideal Pure Digital Flip UltraHD Sony MHS-CM1 Pure Digital Flip MinoHD Kodak Zi6
Red
Green
Blue
Light Skin
Dark Skin

Whether it’s from new processing or an enhanced auto white balance system, the Flip UltraHD represents a strong improvement in color accuracy over the Flip MinoHD. The results still aren’t great, but for a cheap, ultra-compact camcorder this is a decent color performance.

Color Score Comparison
0
2
4
6
10
Color Score

The Flip UltraHD had slightly more accurate colors in low light than it did with bright light. This is a fairly common occurrence with cheap consumer camcorders, as they have difficulty white balancing correctly under strong, bright light. The UltraHD measured a low light color error of 4.99 with a saturation level of 110.89% in our testing. The Flip MinoHD did a bit better in this test, posting a color error of only 2.9. More on how we test low light color.

Low Light Color Accuracy Performance
Color Error Map
The map on the left is a diagram of the color error. The length and direction of each line indicates how the camera processed each particular color while capturing video.

The Pure Digital Flip UltraHD produced a color error of and a saturation level of in our bright light color testing.

In the color error map above, you can see that light blue colors gave the Flip UltraHD the most trouble, as well as some purple tones. The camcorder was very accurate with reds and browns in low light. Below, you can see that each camcorder did a decent job capturing colors in low light. The Sony MHS-CM1 produced a significantly darker image than the rest of the models, but its colors were still strong in our low light testing.

Low Light Color Score Comparison
5
6
7
8
9
12
Low Light Color Score

The Flip UltraHD measured very low noise levels in our bright light testing. The camcorder registered only 0.51% noise, which is lower than the numbers we got from the Sony MHS-CM1 (0.6725% noise). For this test, we don’t have hard data on the Flip MinoHD or Kodak Zi6 as they are camcorder’s we tested last year (before this test was implemented). More on how we test noise.

Pure Digital Flip UltraHD Noise Comparisons

Pure Digital Flip UltraHD
100% Crop

Above, you get a good look at each camcorder’s video quality under bright light. The Flip MinoHD and Kodak Zi6 clearly have color issues and the warm, orange tones are especially visible in these 100% crops. The Flip UltraHD and Sony MHS-CM1 have decent images in their crops. The Sony shows a bit more detail and sharpness, although the Flip UltraHD has more contrast. You can see some mild discoloration on the Flip UltraHD as well—its image appears to have a slight greenish tone.

Noise Score Comparison
Pure Digital Flip UltraHD
10.86
Sony MHS-CM1
8.97
6
7
8
9
10
13
Noise Score

Shop for the Pure Digital Flip UltraHD

Advertisement

Shop for the Pure Digital Flip UltraHD

Loading Recently Viewed Products
Advertisement

Latest News
& Reviews

Top Rated Camcorders

  • Canon  Vixia HF G10
    Canon  Vixia HF G10
    $1,499.99
    1

    Canon Vixia HF G10

    With the Vixia HF G10 ($1499 MSRP), Canon's latest flagship camcorder, the company decided to use a completely different image sensor with a smaller amount of pixels. If you check out the results from our performance testing, you'll quickly see the change paid off—particularly in low light situations. Read full 5-part review

    $1,499.99
    Any Type
    Consumer
    Any Media Type
    Internal Flash Memory
  • Panasonic HDC-TM900
    Panasonic HDC-TM900
    $1,099.00
    2

    Panasonic HDC-TM900

    The Panasonic HDC-TM900 is the successor to the lauded HDC-TM700, our pick for Camcorder of the Year in 2010. The TM900 offers the same fantastic video performance as its predecessor, particularly with its widely-praised 1080/60p mode, but Panasonic didn't improve on much else. Read full 5-part review

    $1,099.00
    Any Type
    Consumer
    Any Media Type
    Internal Flash Memory
  • Panasonic HC-X900M
    Panasonic HC-X900M
    $999.00
    3

    Panasonic HC-X900M

    The HC-X900M is the replacement for last year's HDC-TM900 flagship HD camcorder from Panasonic, but if you're looking for hot new features or exciting updates then you should prepare to be disappointed. Other than a few design alterations and some slight tweaks to the lens and sensor, the HC-X900 is identical to its predecessor. Read full 5-part review

    $999.00
    Any Type
    Consumer
    Any Media Type
    Internal Flash Memory
  • Canon  Vixia HF M40
    Canon  Vixia HF M40
    $599.99
    4

    Canon Vixia HF M40

    The Canon HF M40 is the latest mid-range camcorder from Canon. With the same risky new sensor, this impressive bargain has great low light performance and a plethora of manual controls. Read full 5-part review

    $599.99
    Any Type
    Consumer
    Any Media Type
  • Sony  Handycam HDR-TD10
    Sony  Handycam HDR-TD10
    $1,499.00
    5

    Sony Handycam HDR-TD10

    The twin lens system featured prominently on the front of the Sony HDR-TD10 should tell you one thing: this is a camcorder that can record 3D video. Read full 5-part review

    $1,499.00
    Any Type
    Consumer
    Any Media Type
    Internal Flash Memory

Features

Advertisement
Pure Digital Flip UltraHD
Camcorder Review

Previous: Page 3

Performance