Advertisement

News

Loading Recently Viewed Products

Top Lab Tested Camcorders

Advertisement

Samsung HMX-R10 Prices

Latest Reviews

Samsung HMX-R10 versus JVC GZ-X900
• The GZ-X900 is twice as expensive as the Samsung HMX-R10.
• Both camcorders have same sensor size, pixel count, and optical zoom.
• The JVC also has slow motion modes, a wide range of still features, and a unique design (with no hand strap).
• The biggest advantage of the GZ-X900 is optical image stabilization and better bright light performance than the R10.
Audio & Other Features (Page 12 of 17) Sony HDR-TG5V Comparison

The Samsung HMX-R10 and the JVC GZ-X900 have a lot of similarities. Both have a 1/2.33-inch CMOS sensor under the hood, can take 9-megapixel still photos, and include a 5x optical zoom. Neither camcorder has any internal memory, and both record to SD/SDHC memory cards. Both camcorders also feature low-quality slow motion modes.

The big difference, however, is the fact that the GZ-X900 is roughly twice the price of the HMX-R10 ($999 for the JVC vs. $499 for the Samsung). What does the GZ-X900 give you for this extra cash? Optical image stabilization is the big thing (the R10 only has digital stabilization), and the X900 has better performance in bright light than the Samsung. Of course, the JVC GZ-X900 is also bigger than the R10, although its smooth, rectangular design makes it quite portable.

While the GZ-X900 did very well in our bright light testing, it ran into a wall when we tested it in low light. Like the Samsung R10, the X900 had horrible low light sensitivity and produced a lot of noise in our testing. Its low light image also produced an odd, greenish hue. The GZ-X900 does not have any alternate frame rates other than its low-quality slow motion modes.

If you want a camcorder that can take 9-megapixel still images, the Samsung HMX-R10 is the better all-around device. The fact that it costs half as much as the GZ-X900 simply reinforces this fact. The Samsung did better in our still image testing and it is a better camcorder in low light conditions than the X900.

  Comparison Specs
 
  Samsung HMX-R10 JVC GZ-X900
Price $499.99 $999.95
Primary Recording Media SD/SDHC memory card SD/SDHC memory card
Secondary Recording Media None None
Image Sensor 1/2.33-inch CMOS 1/2.33-inch CMOS
Effective Pixel Count 5.3 megapixels (video)
9 megapixels (still)
Unknown (video)
9-megapixel (stills)
Mic Input None None
LCD 2.7-inch with 230,000 pixels 2.8-inch with 207,000 pixels
Viewfinder None None
Weight 229g (without battery) 298g
Dimensions 38.3 x 56.8 x 128.2mm 37 x 66 x 124mm
HD Yes Yes
Frame Rates 1080/60i, 1080/30p, 720/60p 1080/60i
Compression H.264 (MPEG-4.AVC) AVCHD
Maximum Bitrate Unknown 24Mbps
Optical Zoom 5x 5x
Stabilization Digital Optical

 

  Scores
  Samsung HMX-R10 JVC GZ-X900
Color 7.22 9.78
Noise 7.15 9.91
Video Sharpness 10.59 12.53
Low Light Sensitivity 0.00 0.00
Low Light Color 7.98 4.13
Low Light Noise 5.57 1.57
Still Sharpness 8.17 6.92
Still Color 11.63 9.94
Still Noise 6.35 1.39

 

  Color Comparison
 
  Samsung
HMX-R10
JVC GZ-X900
Red
  Samsung
HMX-R10
JVC GZ-X900
Green
  Samsung
HMX-R10
JVC GZ-X900
Blue
  Samsung
HMX-R10
JVC GZ-X900
Skin
Tone 1
  Samsung
HMX-R10
JVC GZ-X900
Skin
Tone 2

 

 

Video Sharpness Score Comparisons

 

Advertisement


Loading Comments