Samsung HMX-R10
JVC GZ-X900 Comparison
Prev
Page 12 of 17
Next
News
- Sony Releases New Bloggie Camcorders With Touchscreens: the MHS-TS20 and MHS-TS10 - September 01, 2010
- Canon Announces New Compact Professional Camcorders—the XF105 and the XF100 - August 31, 2010
- JVC Announces New Ultracompact Picsio Camcorders: the GC-WP10 and GC-FM2 - August 23, 2010
- Samsung Unveils Another 'Flip-Killer': The HMX-E10 With Swivel Lens and Touchscreen LCD - July 28, 2010
Top Lab Tested Camcorders
Samsung HMX-R10 Prices
Latest Reviews
- Canon XF105 First Impressions Camcorder Review - September 02, 2010
- Panasonic G2 DSLR Camera Review - August 31, 2010
- Panasonic HM-TA1 Camcorder Review - August 26, 2010
- Sanyo Xacti VPC-CS1 Camcorder Review - August 13, 2010
- Sanyo Announces Full HD Waterproof Camcorder: The VPC-CA102 - August 05, 2010
| Samsung HMX-R10 versus JVC GZ-X900 | ||||
• The GZ-X900 is twice as expensive as the Samsung HMX-R10.• Both camcorders have same sensor size, pixel count, and optical zoom. • The JVC also has slow motion modes, a wide range of still features, and a unique design (with no hand strap). • The biggest advantage of the GZ-X900 is optical image stabilization and better bright light performance than the R10. |
||||
|
Audio & Other Features | (Page 12 of 17) | Sony HDR-TG5V Comparison | |
The Samsung HMX-R10 and the JVC GZ-X900 have a lot of similarities. Both have a 1/2.33-inch CMOS sensor under the hood, can take 9-megapixel still photos, and include a 5x optical zoom. Neither camcorder has any internal memory, and both record to SD/SDHC memory cards. Both camcorders also feature low-quality slow motion modes.
The big difference, however, is the fact that the GZ-X900 is roughly twice the price of the HMX-R10 ($999 for the JVC vs. $499 for the Samsung). What does the GZ-X900 give you for this extra cash? Optical image stabilization is the big thing (the R10 only has digital stabilization), and the X900 has better performance in bright light than the Samsung. Of course, the JVC GZ-X900 is also bigger than the R10, although its smooth, rectangular design makes it quite portable.
While the GZ-X900 did very well in our bright light testing, it ran into a wall when we tested it in low light. Like the Samsung R10, the X900 had horrible low light sensitivity and produced a lot of noise in our testing. Its low light image also produced an odd, greenish hue. The GZ-X900 does not have any alternate frame rates other than its low-quality slow motion modes.
If you want a camcorder that can take 9-megapixel still images, the Samsung HMX-R10 is the better all-around device. The fact that it costs half as much as the GZ-X900 simply reinforces this fact. The Samsung did better in our still image testing and it is a better camcorder in low light conditions than the X900.
| Comparison Specs | ||
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Samsung HMX-R10 | JVC GZ-X900 | |
| Price | $499.99 | $999.95 |
| Primary Recording Media | SD/SDHC memory card | SD/SDHC memory card |
| Secondary Recording Media | None | None |
| Image Sensor | 1/2.33-inch CMOS | 1/2.33-inch CMOS |
| Effective Pixel Count | 5.3 megapixels (video) 9 megapixels (still) |
Unknown (video) 9-megapixel (stills) |
| Mic Input | None | None |
| LCD | 2.7-inch with 230,000 pixels | 2.8-inch with 207,000 pixels |
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Weight | 229g (without battery) | 298g |
| Dimensions | 38.3 x 56.8 x 128.2mm | 37 x 66 x 124mm |
| HD | Yes | Yes |
| Frame Rates | 1080/60i, 1080/30p, 720/60p | 1080/60i |
| Compression | H.264 (MPEG-4.AVC) | AVCHD |
| Maximum Bitrate | Unknown | 24Mbps |
| Optical Zoom | 5x | 5x |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Scores | ||
| Samsung HMX-R10 | JVC GZ-X900 | |
| Color | 7.22 | 9.78 |
| Noise | 7.15 | 9.91 |
| Video Sharpness | 10.59 | 12.53 |
| Low Light Sensitivity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Low Light Color | 7.98 | 4.13 |
| Low Light Noise | 5.57 | 1.57 |
| Still Sharpness | 8.17 | 6.92 |
| Still Color | 11.63 | 9.94 |
| Still Noise | 6.35 | 1.39 |
| Color Comparison | ||
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Samsung HMX-R10 |
JVC GZ-X900 | |
| Red | ![]() |
![]() |
| Samsung HMX-R10 |
JVC GZ-X900 | |
| Green | ![]() |
![]() |
| Samsung HMX-R10 |
JVC GZ-X900 | |
| Blue | ![]() |
![]() |
| Samsung HMX-R10 |
JVC GZ-X900 | |
| Skin Tone 1 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Samsung HMX-R10 |
JVC GZ-X900 | |
| Skin Tone 2 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Video Sharpness Score Comparisons |
![]() |
• The GZ-X900 is twice as expensive as the Samsung HMX-R10.













