-
Introduction
-
01.Product Tour
-
02.Color & Noise Performance
-
03.Motion & Resolution Performance
-
04.Low Light Performance
-
05.Audio
-
06.Compression & Media
-
07.Manual Controls
-
08.Still Features
-
09.Handling & Use
-
10.Playback & Connectivity
-
11.Canon XL H1A Comparison
-
12.Sony HVR-Z5U Comparison
-
13.Panasonic AG-HVX200 Comparison
-
14.Conclusion
-
15.Photo Gallery
-
16.Specs and Ratings
-
17.Comments
Sony HDR-FX1000
Previous: Page 10
Playback & ConnectivityNext: Page 12
Sony HVR-Z5U Comparison
Sony HDR-FX1000 versus Canon XL H1A
• Two very different camcorders as far as price and size are concerned, but showed us similar video performances
• The XL H1A is clearly better made and has far better layout of buttons, settings, and features
• More audio features are present on the XL H1A, including 2 XLR inputs and independent channel level control.
The Canon XL H1A is a shoulder-mounted professional camcorder that also records HDV footage to MiniDV tape. Its larger design makes for much better access to manual controls and an overall easier video-taping experience than the HDR-FX1000. The Canon XL H1A also has more connectivity features as well as 2-channel XLR audio inputs. According to our testing, the video performances of the two camcorders wasn't all that difference, although the Canon XL H1A held a clear edge in low light sensitivity. The HDR-FX1000 did show us better video resolution and its motion looked nicer as a result. These are two vastly different camcorders in the long run, the XL H1A is more suited towards pros and its price reflects as such ($5999 MSRP). If you want the better manual control features and don't mind the added size or price tag of the XL H1A it is a very good option. Stick with the HDR-FX1000 if you don't care about audio and aren't fussy about your controls being sleek, smooth, and comfortable.
| Comparison Specs | ||
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Sony HDR-FX1000 | Canon XL H1A | |
| Price | $3199 | $5999 (with lens) |
| Primary Recording Media | MiniDV tape | MiniDV tape |
| Still Image Media | Memory Stick Pro Duo | SD/SDHC, MMC cards |
| Image Sensor | Three 1/3-inch CMOS | Three 1/3-inch CCD |
| Effective Pixel Count | 1.04 Megapixels | 1.56 Megapixels |
| Lens Mount | No interchangeable lens | XL interchangeable lens system |
| Audio Input | 3.5mm mini-jack | 2 XLR, 3.5mm mini-jack (2-channel capable) |
| LCD/Viewfinder | 3.2-inch LCD with 921,000 pixels 0.45-inch EVF with 1,227,000 pixels |
2.4-inch color LCD with 215,000 pixels LCD also serves as viewfinder |
| Weight | 2100g (4.56 lbs.) fully loaded | 3935g (8.7 lbs.) fully loaded |
| Dimensions | 169 × 178 × 349mm (6.75 x 7 x 13.9 in.) | 226 x 220 x 496mm (8.9 x 8.7 x 19.5 in.) |
| Uncompressed Video output | No | No |
| Optical Zoom | 20x | 20x (with provided lens) |
| Frame Rates | HDV: 60i, 30p, 24p | HDV: 1080/60i, 30F, 24F |
| Scores | ||
| Color | 9.05 | 11.7 |
| Noise | 7.22 | 9.56 |
| Video Resolution | 11.79 | 9.34 |
| Low Light Sensitivity | 4.56 | 8.04 |
| Low Light Color | 6.53 | 7.36 |
| Low Light Noise | 6.62 | 6.29 |
| Battery Life (LCD) | 7.6 | 11.8 |
In comparison to the Canon XL H1A, the Sony HDR-FX1000 really only underperformed on two key tests: Battery Life, and Low Light Sensitivity.
| Battery Life (LCD) Comparisons |
![]() |
The Canon XL H1A lasted nearly twice as long in our battery test as compared to the HDR-FX1000. This test was conducted using the supplied battery pack, which, to be fair, is probably not what most pros or prosumers will be running their camcorder with. Even so, the Canon XL H1A lasted for nearly 4 hours with its supplied battery. With that kind of performance you may not have to even buy a back-up. Most HDR-FX1000 users, on the other hand, would probably benefit greatly from an extra battery pack.
| Required Illumination * |
![]() |
| * the lower the lux required, the better the performance |
With low light sensitivity, you can clearly see the difference between the Sony HDR-FX1000 and Canon XL H1A. The numbers may not appear to be all that different, but just a few lux of separation means a lot in this test. The Sony HDR-FX1000 repeatedly showed us a dark image in auto mode, which is something that probably added to its diminished low light sensitivity performance.
| Video Resolution Score Comparisons |
![]() |
The HDR-FX1000 did shock us with a splendid video resolution score, which is promising for the small prosumer camcorder. The motion captured by the FX1000 also looked crisp and clean, even in areas where many great camcorders show signs of trailing and blur. If you end up buying the HDR-FX1000 you can rest easy knowing you own a product that produces quality video.
Shop for the Sony HDR-FX1000
Latest News
& Reviews
-
16-May-2012
Panasonic HC-V500M Camcorder Review
The Panasonic HC-V500M is a small, lightweight, budget camcorder that offers a lot for its $499 MSRP. Read More...
-
04-May-2012
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Digital Camera Reivew
Along with its retro design and weather-sealed body, the Olympus E-M5 features a robust movie mode that provides you with a variety of manual video controls and features. Read More...
Top Rated
Features
-
An Introduction to High Definition Video.
Understand what’s going on in the world of HD camcorders so you can make sense of it all and make an informed decision on your next purchase. Read More...
-
CamcorderInfo.com 2010 Selects Awards
Our awards for the best camcorders in 2010. Read More...
-
The Student Filmmaker's Buying Guide To Consumer Camcorders
For the student filmmaker, finding the right camcorder can be a very arduous task. This article goes through the best consumer camcorders on the market for the student filmmaker, and all of these models can be found for $1500 or less. Read More...
-
Video Editing Software For Your Camcorder
Most consumer camcorders come with some kind of editing program, but the quality of this provided software can range drastically. This article offers an overview and critique for these editing programs. Read More...





(add your own)