-
Introduction
-
01.Design
-
02.Product Tour
-
03.Performance
-
04.Color Performance
-
05.Low Light Performance
-
06.Motion Performance
-
07.Sharpness Performance
-
08.Sample Videos
-
09.Usability
-
10.Ease of Use
-
11.Handling
-
12.Controls
-
13.Features
-
14.Recording Options
-
15.Hardware
-
16.Other Features
-
17.Sanyo VPC-HD2000 Comparison
-
18.JVC GZ-X900 Comparison
-
19.Sony HDR-XR520V Comparison
-
20.Conclusion
-
21.Photo Gallery
-
22.Specs & Ratings
-
23.Comments
Sony HDR-TG5V
Previous: Page 6
Motion PerformanceNext: Page 8
Sample VideosSharpness Performance
Video Sharpness (8.89)
The HDR-TG5V is not a top-notch camcorder when it comes to video sharpness, but it still put forth a decent performance. In our test, the TG5V measured a horizontal sharpness of 600 lw/ph and a vertical sharpness of 550 lw/ph. These numbers are lower than what you’ll see from most high-end camcorders (like the Sony HDR-XR520V or Canon HF S11), and they are more akin to the average sharpness scores on mid-range models (like a Panasonic HDC-TM10 or JVC GZ-HD300). Still, we don’t want to give the impression that the HDR-TG5V doesn’t capture sharp video—it does—it simply isn’t a top-level performer in this category. More on how we test video sharpness.
Stabilization (7.05)
The HDR-TG5V is equipped with Sony’s SteadyShot stabilization system and the results were quite good in our testing. In fact, the TG5V’s impressive stabilization may represent its single biggest advantage over the Sanyo VPC-HD2000, which had horrible stabilization. The stabilization system used by the TG5V is digital, which means it may result in some image degredation when used. Sony’s higher-end models, like the HDR-XR520V and HDR-CX500V use optical stabilization systems. More on how we test stabilization.
In our low shake test, the HDR-TG5V was able to reduce 49% of the shake with SteadyShot engaged. You can see the results quite clearly in the graph below. The blue lines represent the movement of the camcorder with stabilization turned off, while the more compact red lines show its motion using SteadyShot. In our high shake test, the camcorder fared a bit worse and was only able to reduce shakiness by 42%. In comparison, the Sanyo VPC-HD2000’s digital stabilization system couldn’t do anything to reduce the shake in our test. In fact, the camcorder actually shook more with image stabilization turned on.
The HDR-TG5V couldn’t match the stabilization results acheieved by its larger cousin model, the Sony HDR-XR520V. This is expected, however, as the XR520V is much heavier and larger than the TG5V. Another thing we noticed with the TG5V was that the camcorder had some trouble maintaining focus during our shake test. Focus would go soft every now and then, although the camcorder did regain it after a few seconds. We must note that we only noticed this when we repeatedly shook the camcorder for an extended period of time (more than a few seconds), as we do in our stabilization test. You can see the image lose focus in our video below:
Shop for the Sony HDR-TG5V
Latest News
& Reviews
-
16-May-2012
Panasonic HC-V500M Camcorder Review
The Panasonic HC-V500M is a small, lightweight, budget camcorder that offers a lot for its $499 MSRP. Read More...
-
04-May-2012
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Digital Camera Reivew
Along with its retro design and weather-sealed body, the Olympus E-M5 features a robust movie mode that provides you with a variety of manual video controls and features. Read More...
Top Rated Camcorders
-

$1,499.991Canon Vixia HF G10
With the Vixia HF G10 ($1499 MSRP), Canon's latest flagship camcorder, the company decided to use a completely different image sensor with a smaller amount of pixels. If you check out the results from our performance testing, you'll quickly see the change paid off—particularly in low light situations. Read full 5-part review
$1,499.99Any TypeConsumerAny Media TypeInternal Flash Memory -

$1,099.002Panasonic HDC-TM900
The Panasonic HDC-TM900 is the successor to the lauded HDC-TM700, our pick for Camcorder of the Year in 2010. The TM900 offers the same fantastic video performance as its predecessor, particularly with its widely-praised 1080/60p mode, but Panasonic didn't improve on much else. Read full 5-part review
$1,099.00Any TypeConsumerAny Media TypeInternal Flash Memory -

$999.003Panasonic HC-X900M
The HC-X900M is the replacement for last year's HDC-TM900 flagship HD camcorder from Panasonic, but if you're looking for hot new features or exciting updates then you should prepare to be disappointed. Other than a few design alterations and some slight tweaks to the lens and sensor, the HC-X900 is identical to its predecessor. Read full 5-part review
$999.00Any TypeConsumerAny Media TypeInternal Flash Memory -

$599.994Canon Vixia HF M40
The Canon HF M40 is the latest mid-range camcorder from Canon. With the same risky new sensor, this impressive bargain has great low light performance and a plethora of manual controls. Read full 5-part review
$599.99Any TypeConsumerAny Media Type -

$1,499.005Sony Handycam HDR-TD10
The twin lens system featured prominently on the front of the Sony HDR-TD10 should tell you one thing: this is a camcorder that can record 3D video. Read full 5-part review
$1,499.00Any TypeConsumerAny Media TypeInternal Flash Memory
Features
-
An Introduction to High Definition Video.
Understand what’s going on in the world of HD camcorders so you can make sense of it all and make an informed decision on your next purchase. Read More...
-
CamcorderInfo.com 2010 Selects Awards
Our awards for the best camcorders in 2010. Read More...
-
The Student Filmmaker's Buying Guide To Consumer Camcorders
For the student filmmaker, finding the right camcorder can be a very arduous task. This article goes through the best consumer camcorders on the market for the student filmmaker, and all of these models can be found for $1500 or less. Read More...
-
Video Editing Software For Your Camcorder
Most consumer camcorders come with some kind of editing program, but the quality of this provided software can range drastically. This article offers an overview and critique for these editing programs. Read More...
(add your own)